Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Healthcare vs. Drug Price

2015 - 12 - 09

Media in Taiwan has been reporting that drug price investigations result in low drug prices and pharmaceutical companies threaten to leave Taiwan.


台灣諸多媒體,一面講因為藥價調查造成健保核價太低、一面說原廠藥要退出台灣,連續不間斷地放送國外藥廠勾結醫師所發表的業配新聞。

他們藉此恐嚇公眾,並灌輸有病也無藥可用的醫療困境。

健保在藥品這個問題上當然有大問題,我們也認為核價這件事情應該有更合理的彈性。但是,大家是否清楚,在台灣,醫師開處方箋過度浮濫(順應病人要求)、病人的部分負擔太輕(上限NT$200)、各醫療院所為相同病人開立重複藥物、病人持處方箋取藥後未服用而廢棄之比例過高等的情事,已經造成台灣健保藥費在健保總支出上占有25%的比例。

我們再看看這篇WSJ報導:

Specialty medications for ills such as cancer and multiple sclerosis are so pricey that despite making up only about 1% of prescription volume at the University of Minnesota, they account for 28% of its drug costs, said Kenneth Horstman, director of benefits and compensation. Pharmacy costs are about 17% of its health plan’s spending, up from less than 14% in 2013

明尼蘇達大學給其現任及退休教職員與家屬(約39,000人)的醫療保險中,支付癌症和多發性硬化症的藥,雖然僅占處方箋的1%,但卻拿走了28%的藥費。2013年,藥費占全部醫療開支的14%,到2014已經到了17%,而17%,已讓老美陷入困境。

Another increasingly common strategy is “step therapy,” which requires that patients to be treated with lower-cost drugs before the health plan will pay for a more expensive option. This year, about 69% of employers had step-therapy rules, compared with 56% in 2011…

藥價年成長幅度近10%,高於其他醫療支出之成長幅度一倍。因此,愈來愈多的美國醫保方案,要求採用漸進式治療,也就是只准醫生處方箋上先開低價藥(否則不准核銷),如果無效才能再開較貴的藥品。2011年時只有56%的雇主採用這種模式的醫保,今年,升到69%。http://www.wsj.com/articles/employers-battle-drug-costs-1450488416

當然,還有其他措施,比方說提高病人必須自付的藥費的部分負擔。明尼蘇達大學已將最高上限調到了USD75,等於台幣$2,400,是台灣健保藥費部分負擔的12倍。

藥價與醫療保險政策,不是僅需搞定藥廠金援就可輕易解套。

Recommended article 

Oracle Going After Amazon in Iaas

“Amazon’s lead is over” said Larry Ellison, whom we considered a character in the business, but we still respect Jeff Bezos more when it comes to his vision and mission in cloud businesses these days. 儘管Ellison是超酷鐵打的老爺,但論到當代雲端事業之格局和視野,我們認為Bezos比他值得受人尊敬。…

Fat Cats under Global Turmoil: Investment Bankers

There is a quote in American TV show Suits between a lawyer and an investment banker, it tells a lot why we call them the fat cat. 知名美劇影集訴訟雙雄(Suits)中有這麼一段商務律師和投資銀行家間的言詞交鋒,從以下這句台詞可以就可以理解,為什麼我們說這些投資銀行家是所謂「當代貴族」了。(影片連結) “We’re not lawyers. We’re investment bankers. We call…

Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines are U.S regulations related to internal controls. Sarbanes-Oxley Act is another commonly heard law. 在美國與內部控制比較相關的法規一個是於1991年生效的聯邦裁法綱領(Federal Sentencing Guidelines)1,另一個則是大家可能比較常聽到的,於2002年所制定之沙賓法案(Sarbanes-Oxley Act)。前者是提供法官一個科刑的客觀標準,同時提供企業遵循法令之誘因;後者則是提出許多與公司治理方面相關的改革制度,其中當然有與內部控制制度息息相關之制度,以下將簡單介紹此兩種法規。 參考資料: 1. 聯邦裁罰綱領(Federal Sentencing Guidelines)是由美國裁罰委員會於1987年5月提出之法案,並於同年11月經過國會同意後成為正式之法律。其目的是希望能夠提供法官一個科刑之客觀標準,根據個人犯罪行為之嚴重性及犯罪歷史而決定其裁罰範圍,才不會發生兩個人違反同樣的法律,由不同的法官來審理,一個法官給予行為人緩刑,另一個法官卻科最高刑度之情形。其後於1991年5月,裁罰委員會另外提出針對組織犯罪行為之裁罰綱領(Organizational Guidelines),經國會同意後成為聯邦裁罰綱領的第8章。本書所討論之範圍即是第8章關於組織犯罪之部分。