Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

SEC Scored Victory in Crypto Crime Crackdown

2018 - 09 - 18

A ruling in the Eastern District of New York sparked controversies in the crypto world as it was the very first time a federal court had weighed in on the SEC’s jurisdiction over ICOs in a criminal case. The SEC has long been cautious in regards to the new funding method of initial coin offering, claiming that most (except Bitcoin and Ether) ICO tokens fall into the definition of securities, therefore, shall be regulated by the Security Act. Despite the SEC’s firm standing on this issue, not much law enforcing actions were taken by the authorities, therefore, the ICO industry continues booming and raised around $12 billion from January through the end of June this year. However, Judge Raymond Dearie of the Eastern District Court’s ruling might just change everything.

The crime case involves Brooklyn businessman Maksim Zaslavskiy, who was charged with conspiracy and two counts of securities fraud for allegedly defrauding investors in two ICO projects. Mr. Zaslavskiy runs two crypto companies – REcoin Group Foundation, LLC and DRC Work, Inc. and offered investors ICO tokens backed by assets like real estate and diamonds. However, these assets were nowhere to be found and investors were not given any new digital tokens after making investments. In Judge Dearie’s ruling against Mr. Zaslavskiy, the court said that sufficient facts showed that the defendant’s ICOs were investment contracts that fall into the Howey Test, and shall be regulated by the SEC under the Security Act.

Although the jury will make the final decision, Judge Dearie’s ruling will nonetheless empower the SEC to take on an even more active and rigorous role in regulating “security” tokens. In return, the SEC should be able to provide more definitive guidance in regards to ICO tokens functioning like secruities. A more definitive guidance is what the crypto industry needs and will potentially tone down the significant numbers of ICO scams.

Source:

U.S. Judge Says Initial Coin Offering Covered by Securities Law – Bloomberg

Judge Lets Cryptocurrency Fraud Case Go Forward, In Win for SEC – WSJ

 

Recommended article 

The Effectiveness of Start-Up Incubators and Accelerators

Building incubators or accelerators has become a thing in Taiwan. Even governments have allocated funds in the business. 近來在台灣,設育成中心或加速器,變成了顯學,連政府都挹注公部門的資源下來一起做。這二個同樣都屬於「幫早期的創業者長大」的概念,彼此該如何劃分,尚非本文重點;在此僅針對我們所觀察到的怪象,略作省思。 現在從北到南的育成中心,都在做些什麼? (1) 提供Co-working space,一定期間免租金 (2) 提供講師、相關課程 (3) 自己投資一點點資源或資金,再提供與投資人媒合的機會 至於那些「嘴砲打很大、小孩生不出、付錢辦領養」的「掛榜」育成,和三流補習班買考上建中台大的名單有什麼差別? 純粹丟人現眼,在此就不提了。 先檢討上述(1), (2), (3)三項。 〔問〕Co-working space有沒有用? 不能說完全沒有。但重不重要? 〔答〕當然不重要。蛤? 「我還以為創業育成中心主要就是在提供這個啊」?…

Is Google too powerful now?

Google was recently slapped with a record-breaking €2.42bn fine for EU antitrust violations. The 7-year long investigation concluded that Google has been abusing its dominance of the search engine market in building its online shopping service, and…

The Internet Era - Does the Music Industry Understand Consumers?

The main reason the music industry in Taiwan not catching up with the Internet Era is the lack of data. 「最近比較煩」的老段以後要幹什麼   「……因為鮮於接受媒體採訪,許多人對滾石老闆段鍾潭的印象仍停留在周華健《最近比較煩》中的這句歌詞之上。 老段說:『互聯網正在摧毀創作者和消費者之間的關聯/我也怕有一天,音樂走上照片沖印業的末路。音樂產業大環境不樂觀,我個人認為比較大的問題在於產業跟消費者基本上是脫鉤的。……』」 http://news.sina.com.tw/article/20150925/15229814.html   音樂產業和消費者脫勾的主因來自大環境不樂觀? 我對段先生是抱著高度敬意的。身為當年公認流行樂界之成功典範,但在面對科技所帶來之改變時,這位大腕兒仍然不停地勇敢嘗試、與時俱進、並且到今天還繼續活著。但是,他所講的這點,我有不同的看法。 「……當年我們做唱片,壓成一張張CD,如果這個藝人表現很好,唱片製作也不錯,那最直接的反映就是有人買你的唱片。唱片公司和消費者之間存在著一個直接的關係。這一點對於經營公司是非常重要的。我們之前做事,真的蠻清楚該怎麼下手,賺錢賠錢真的是結果,絕對不是目的,做得不好就摸摸鼻子去檢討。然而在互聯網的長期影響下,這方面就發生了脫節,譬如大家都知道《小蘋果》很紅,但紅到什麼程度,這個概念就變得很模糊。CD時代之所以清楚,是因為消費者要花錢,而現如今,比如你一天聽了500首歌,可能有些聽20秒就跳過去,聽者在做這些決定的時候沒有代價,所以可能會比較草率,沒有辦法體現他對這個東西的認可。這個是我覺得大環境不好的地方…」 下面幾件事,老段,您不會不知道吧?! (1) 當年CD裡,總是兩首好聽的搭八首爛歌+充數的演奏曲 (2) 當年出一張CD,打歌宣傳行銷動輒破千萬台幣;因此,像陳明真這種五音不全的傻B歌手發片,都能在90年代銷售排進連續多周前十名 (3) 究竟是什麼樣的消費者、聽多少次你的歌、又在何時何地聽、過了多久又挖出來再聽、聽你的歌是第一次就跳過還是一直連續聽個不停……