Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 - The War Has just Begun

2018 - 07 - 06

California lawmakers passed a new privacy bill last thursday ( 6/29), which gives state residents more control over the information that businesses collect on them and in addition, penalise businesses that do not comply. It is the first law of its kind in the United States.

The so-called California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (AB 375) gives Californians the right to see what information businesses collect on them, get access to information on the types of companies their data has been sold to, and request businesses to stop selling that information to third parties. This privacy act is similar to the new EU General Data Protection Regulation, but with crucial additions. Under the GDPR protections, businesses are required to get users’ permissions prior to collecting and storing their data. However, through opt-in pop-ups designed by these companies, consumers don’t really have a choice but to give consent, in order to use these services. In contrast, the Californian bill would create the  “Spotify exception”, “which allows companies to offer different services or rates to consumers based on the information they provide—for instance, a free product based on advertising. But, the bill states, the difference must be “reasonably related to the value provided to the consumer by the consumer’s data.”

Experts in this field believe that the law will have tremendous impacts and potentially set standards for states across the nation. However, between companies and consumers, the storm of conflicts might just be coming.

Sources:California Unanimously Passes Historic Privacy BillCalifornia just passed one of the toughest data privacy laws in the country

 

Recommended article 

Can Alibaba Cloud Duplicate Their Chinese-Market Success in U.S?

Alibaba is selling its American subsidiary 11 Main to American E-commerce platform OpenSky, which means Alibaba has failed in U.S market. 阿里攻美國電商 鎩羽而歸 「阿里巴巴集團將出售美國子公司11 Main(https://11main.com/)給美國電商OpenSky,這意味著阿里巴巴進軍美國電商市場鎩羽而歸,在這筆換股交易中,阿里巴巴將獲得OpenSky的37.6%股份,交易金額並未透露。」 http://ppt.cc/UDjax 「阿里雲」有一天會變得像AWS一樣,被全球認同? 真能成功複製在中國的「成功經驗」? 這篇文章已證明BABA去國外連電商的成功經驗都複製不出來;公有雲? 誰會把自家的系統放到這個以網路長城揚威全球的中國共產黨所圈養的公有雲上? Aliyun在出了網路長城之後,唯一能攻的市場就是以近乎免費的方式吸引創業者在開發階段利用;等開發完成進入商轉時,再看看有沒有機會把人家給留著(比方說,BABA投資他們)。但是,留下來的,腦袋的洞基本上也跟馬雲他們一樣大,這樣的創業者會不會成功? 如果是中國企業到外國落地,除了藏錢之外,同時也得趕緊設法讓自己全家都辦好外國護照;一切透過IT上的交易,當然要躲老共躲得愈遠愈好,誰會想用阿里雲? 〔Aliyun的國外客戶數 = 無腦公有雲用戶 +…

Internal Control Systems : Born With Flaws (Part 3)

Corporations create affiliated companies for synergy, business development or horizontal and vertical integration. But they seldom take the operations of the affiliated companies into account then designing the internal control systems. 內控機制的先天缺陷-關係企業之內部控制遭到忽略 公司為了水平整合、垂直整合、綜效考量及業務拓展等因素經常必須設立關係企業,但是部分公司在設計內部控制制度時未將關係企業的整體營運活動一同考量,容易造成內控的漏洞。實務上,時有母公司未於內部控制制度中訂定子公司的內部控制作業、未督促子公司建立內部控制制度、亦未對子公司執行稽核作業。 某些上市、上櫃公司因為經營規模龐大,通常都在國外擁有關係企業,但是因為語言因素以及管理成本之考量,對於關係企業的內部控制要求僅止於案時提供其財務報表,方便總公司編制聯合財報。如此一來,縱使企業有良好的內部控制制度,若未確實要求關係企業遵循,也是枉然。總公司內稽人員只能以書面方式複核關係企業所給予之內控自評結果,效果有限。 關係企業的內部控制制度如果被忽略也會造成嚴重的後果。首先,關係企業營運的好壞會影響到企業本身,不論是在投資的獲利方面或是商譽方面都有舉足輕重的影響,若是因為關係企業營運上出差錯,企業本身也會因此受牽連。除此之外,一定規模以上的企業每年都必須請會計師簽證期財務報表,而公開發行公司也必須製作關係企業的聯合財報。舉例來說,資產負債表是財務報表之其中一種,必須經過會計師簽證的,而關係企業在資產負債表上是以長期股權投資的項目來呈現,如果會計師想了解該表上長期股權投資損益數字的正確性,則勢必必須也去了解關係企業的財務報表及相關內部控制制度。 縱使關係企業有了內部控制制度,也還沒完!總公司在查核關係企業、分公司或其他營業據點之工作上仍然會有實際上無法解決的齟齬。以下以證券商查核公司之實務為例:…

Part-timers' Rights

US unemployment rate is looking good. It rose to 10% in 2008 but has been at around 5% over the past two years. 美國的就業數據表面看來不差。失業率,08年金融海嘯後曾飆上10%,但最近這兩年都落在5%左右。 然而,因為失業數據裡不包括「對人生絕望不再求職的」、「打零工的」、「每月工資無法滿足食衣住行的」那些人,而他們也正是希拉蕊口中低教育程度、低工作技能、既可悲又沒尊嚴的”Deplorables”。看不見自己的未來,於是大家就送給了川普四年「讓美國再次偉大」的未來。 計時工必然賺很少嗎? 美國餐飲業普遍的現象,小費(通例是收銀機帳單金額的10%以上),是顧客在付帳時隨自己開心給的。如果不算速食業,那種坐下來好好吃頓飯、有服務員去桌邊幫你點菜的餐廳,在大城市裡,平均每餐加上非酒精飲料和甜點,一個人吃到US$40(不提中餐晚餐價格差異、也更不提開上一兩瓶葡萄酒動輒餐費翻倍)以上根本不算件事。服務到讓客人開心,小費給15%同樣也不算件事。以平均每桌二人、五名服務員伺候二十桌、每天每桌從中餐到晚餐總共做了三輪來計算,那家餐廳當天的小費會收到: 20 * 3 * 2 * $40 * 15%…