Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

The Trump Effect

2016 - 11 - 28

trump-on-stage

Markets worry about president-elect’s trade policy would be bad for Apple. Trump has publicly stated that he would force Apple to move its manufacturing back to U.S.

川普上台,市場普遍擔心新任美國總統的貿易政策將對蘋果不利,因為他曾公開表示:上任後將逼蘋果將產品生產搬回美國。川普效應對蘋果的影響,此篇作者的分析非常淺顯易懂,值得一讀,摘要如下:

1. 川普想讓蘋果回流美國製造及組裝
2. 川普請蘋果創造美國工人就業機會
3. 川普想對中國進口貨物課反傾銷稅
4. 川普想對企業調降海外盈餘匯回稅

(1)與(2)都不可能。各代iPhone從產品設計到最後之組裝所需之「應變」靈活度極高,目前尚非機器人能取代,之前Mac在美國的自動化產線也早已告停。

縱然搬回美國製造在財務上所大幅增加的人工成本(不論是否轉嫁消費者)尚不致於讓Apple進入負毛利,美國依舊找不出任何一個地方能生出那麼大量的skilled labor來建廠。

(3) 會帶來兩種效應,一是逼使iPhone搬去印度組裝(Foxconn在那兒佈局甚早,郭董是早就預測到了川普會上嗎?),二是中國對美企進行報復(各國企早已開始的「去IOE」(IBM, Oracle, EMC) 已經讓這些老牌B2B的IT廠很慘了,這下再燒到B2C的庫克,他想,萬一日後iPhone在中國被禁售…..)

(4) 確有可能。但是想用它來當誘因,拱Apple執行(1)(2),一樣機會渺茫。

新聞來源:
Apple: The Trump Effect

圖片來源:
Gage Skidmore @ Flickr CC BY SA 2.0

Recommended article 

Internal Controls and Compliance Regulations in Taiwan

In Taiwan, Criteria for Establishment of Internal Control Systems by Public Companies is the most significant regulation regarding internal controls. 在台灣,最主要的內部控制規範是「公開發行公司建立內部控制制度處理準則」,本準則是依據證券交易法的規定授權,而由前主管機關「財政部證券暨期貨管理委員會」(現已改為行政院金融監督管理委員會)於民國91年11月18日所發布的,目前最新的條文則是於民國96年7月17日修正過後的版本。 由於COSO報告與美國的沙賓法案對於全世界的影響力極為廣大深遠,我國當然也不可能置身事外而不受到美國的影響,大致上,我國內控處理準則的三大目標與五大要素都是符合COSO報告所提出的架構,為了因應許多企業弊案而生的沙賓法案也是我國規範的最佳參考對象。 我國的內控處理準則並非如大陸一樣是以上市公司為施行對象,而是範圍稍微廣一點的公開發行公司1,而依據該處理準則的定義,內部控制是指:「由經理人所設計,經董事會所通過,並由董事會、經理人及其他員工執行之管理過程,其目的在於促進公司的健全經營,以合理確保下列目標之達成:一、營運之效果及效率。二、財務報導之可靠性。三、相關法令之遵循。」COSO報告的影響力可見一斑。 雖然美、中、台的內部控制制度應是系出同源,下我們仍然想要從我國的內控處理準則裡面找出一些蛛絲馬跡,看看在一些重要的制度方面,台灣是否跟得上世界潮流? 參考資料: 1. 首次辦理公開發行之公司必須建立有效的內部控制制度,並經會計師審查認為無重大缺失後才能申請公開發行。

Internal Controls Cannot Prevent Executive Fraud ?

Chairwoman of Procomp had constantly made fake transaction with BVI to boost its financial reports. The internal staff might had been reluctant to disclose the criminal activities, but the accounting firm which approved all financial reports…

Netflix's Market Cap is Way Too High

Does Netflix Have Long-Term Upside Past A $40 Billion Valuation?          Summary At $40 billion NFLX trades at multiples that far exceed the industry average, meaning it is an investment for the future.…