Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Cord-Cutters - The Nightmare for Cable Providers to Come ?

2015 - 10 - 30

We been expecting cord-cutters for a while and have yet seen any moves.

剪線潮,喊很久,卻只聞樓梯響,不見人下來。

  1. Cord-Cutting Might Not Be So Bad for Cable Companies

Today, video is only about 40% of cable companies’ profits… For a typical cable operator, a 10% loss in video subscribers trims revenues by 6% but only trims profits by about 4%….

http://blogs.wsj.com/briefly/2015/04/12/5-things-to-know-about-cord-cutters/

這篇小文章的第5點我本來還不知道。

以4G而言,我用手機上Netflix和Amazon Prime透過MHL接大螢幕,看這麼久了,1080p始終流暢,一次lag都沒有。家裡如果有ZTE MF910或D-Link DWR921這種LTE分享器加吃到飽,看片和一般上網都夠,光纖或cable的確可以砍了。

而自製內容、專屬獨家,是否為cord-cutting蔚然成風的關鍵?

YouTube Red: Trigger For Cord Cutting?

Google’s YouTube announced its first-ever subscription service last week, YouTube Red, with the usual set of (uninteresting) “premium” features– ad-free videos and offline/background playback. The only interesting tidbit was that YouTube Red also would house “original” movies and TV shows starring well-known YouTube personalities. While it may seem mundane, this move has the potential to present a true disruption to the TV industry.

In addition to scale, creating a parallel library of premium content also gives YouTube another strategic advantage. Teenagers who have grown up watching YouTube could increasingly gravitate toward long-form content produced by personalities and brands they are familiar with. Long-term, this could decrease interest in traditional movies and TV shows (maybe even sports), leading to real cord cutting.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/3621666-youtube-red-trigger-cord-cutting

這篇Seeking Alpha的文章,沒抓住真重點。

我的觀察是,YouTube Red能否打敗Amazon Prime及Netflix,搶先將主要的體育台、地區新聞台、全國新聞網、肥皂劇、脫口秀… 都收羅進它的頻道裡,才是cord-cutting會不會蔚然成風的關鍵。自製內容,專屬獨家,都不是。

Recommended article 

Glut of Everything

This analysis from Wall Street Journal is very interesting. The glut of money has widened the gap between the rich and the poor. Continue reading

How to Improve the Doctor-Patient Relationship - Part 2

The doctor-patient relationship is a matter of great importance in Taiwan. Once we have a clue, its not that hard to improve. 二、思考方向: 減少健保給付項目:要有改革的道德勇氣。除了前述已有同成分劑量劑型的學名藥之原廠藥價外並且提高藥品自付額以減少台灣特有的「藥不拿白不拿」的惡習之外,更不能被可憐的罕病故事牽著鼻子走。病人永遠是值得同情的,罕見疾病的家庭更是。但是,如果沒搞懂社會保險與個案救助之間的本質差異,必將拖累大局。 提高承擔重責之醫護待遇:要改善五大科(內外婦兒急)皆空之現象,必須先從尊重著手。打高空沒有用,香蕉只能餵猴子,這是最基本的道理。健保必須善用如前述所節省下來的經費,提高特定項目之點值並強制醫療院所將增額分配給醫護人員、並且為其投保責任險(詳下述);請他們重新念十遍希波克拉提斯誓詞,不如從這裡做起。 醫療過失責任保險必須普及:一方面擴大「業務上之正當行為,不罰」的阻卻違法事由之判斷,讓醫護除非有惡意之怠忽職務,否則不必擔心刑責;另一方面,則更不能阻礙病家循民事司法求償之權利。但是,倘若不能循私人責任保險的機制處理,那麼光是訴訟以及因而帶來的賠償風險,就會妨礙頂尖人才加入醫護的行列,更非全民之福。台灣的產險公司向來對於責任險種之開辦興趣缺缺,有其歷史成因,不在此贅論;但是,台灣市場一直以來除非像汽車的責任險因有強制規定,否則多半保戶太少,風險亦無從分散,賠償上限也太低。這部分,是稍修法令(比方說,按一定基礎投保醫療責任險的醫事單位,給付點值可以作對應的向上調整等等)就能輕易完成的事情,各家產險公司的意願問題,更可以由金管會把他們約來喝咖啡解決。 醫病關係何等大的事情,但只要抓到頭緒去整理,並不難解。惟醫糾法這種「頭痛醫膝蓋」的作法,可悲可嘆。

As Fed Finally Raises Rates

Fed bets that low rates’ job benefits outweigh any financial disruption 2004,聯準會開始升息;2007,次級貸款這個核彈爆了,陷入大衰退。 Fed bets that low rates’ job benefits outweigh any financial disruption 一句話解釋次級貸款危機的核心:華爾街一群自以為聰明之人把鉅大風險披上糖衣的衍生性金融商品,並藉此賺取暴利。 2015,聯準會開始升息。 當年的次貸,透過精密惡毒的計算,把愈來愈多錢以貨幣乘數從銀行裡循環生出來、再借給那批信用根本不夠好的人去買房。當利率升、房價跌的時候,結果不言可喻,當然就是一間房一間房因為抵押貸款還不出而被拍賣,讓房價再進一步下跌。 WSJ作了簡單的折線圖,列出過去三次(1994, 1999, 2004)Fed調升利率時,存款、房貸、車貸利率之相應變化。 結論: 1. 存款利率幾乎沒動 2. 房貸利率前二次升,第三次微降 3. 車貸利率三次全升…