Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Apple to Invest in Original Content

2015 - 09 - 02

Apple’s Move Into Content Creation Could Devastate Netflix And Amazon

Summary

Apple is reported to be recruiting executives to head up a content creation effort.

Apple will probably fund outside production companies to create Apple exclusive content as Netflix does.

This original content is expected to appear in a streaming video service for iTunes and Apple’s various devices. http://seekingalpha.com/article/3482136-apples-move-content-creation-devastate-netflix-amazon

重創 Netflix,問題不大;重創 Amazon? 不可能。

今年 6 月身價二百億美金的天王投資人 Carl Icahn 出清手上 Netflix 股票套現十億美金時,我就說過「Netflix是個不錯的視頻平台,我也是忠實用戶。但它的 China story 一點都不靠譜,目前21倍的股價淨值比、以及一直往200倍在衝的本益比,絲毫不具備合理性。再加上,Netflix距離構築一個完整、客戶不易離開的生態系,還遠得很…」 (補充:目前 NFLX 的 P/E 已經破 250 倍了)請參https://www.facebook.com/790294164/posts/10153450172144165

Netflix 所提供的服務,滿足了人們日常生活裡的一小部分需求;但其可替代性,很高。

Amazon 呢?

當然,Apple 有二千億美元的現金部位還有一大部分停泊在美國境外,挪一部分買授權或製作獨家內容毫不費力。像我之前提到Netflix 用十億美金鎖了 Epix 兩年獨家內容這招,Apple 更是玩得起,再結合 Apple TV 搞軟硬補貼同時配合全球電信商去推相關收視資費方案,也挺合理。但是,這樣最多也只能戳破 Netflix 的泡沫吧? 我的預測是,這對 Amazon 股價之影響,連 5% 都沒有,要怎麼重創?

Recommended article 

Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines are U.S regulations related to internal controls. Sarbanes-Oxley Act is another commonly heard law. 在美國與內部控制比較相關的法規一個是於1991年生效的聯邦裁法綱領(Federal Sentencing Guidelines)1,另一個則是大家可能比較常聽到的,於2002年所制定之沙賓法案(Sarbanes-Oxley Act)。前者是提供法官一個科刑的客觀標準,同時提供企業遵循法令之誘因;後者則是提出許多與公司治理方面相關的改革制度,其中當然有與內部控制制度息息相關之制度,以下將簡單介紹此兩種法規。 參考資料: 1. 聯邦裁罰綱領(Federal Sentencing Guidelines)是由美國裁罰委員會於1987年5月提出之法案,並於同年11月經過國會同意後成為正式之法律。其目的是希望能夠提供法官一個科刑之客觀標準,根據個人犯罪行為之嚴重性及犯罪歷史而決定其裁罰範圍,才不會發生兩個人違反同樣的法律,由不同的法官來審理,一個法官給予行為人緩刑,另一個法官卻科最高刑度之情形。其後於1991年5月,裁罰委員會另外提出針對組織犯罪行為之裁罰綱領(Organizational Guidelines),經國會同意後成為聯邦裁罰綱領的第8章。本書所討論之範圍即是第8章關於組織犯罪之部分。

Who's Going to Buy Netflix?

This is old news, but there are still pundits believe that Amazon is going to buy Netflix. Continue reading

Amazon's Dominance in OTT

We have been through Netflix’s obstacles to success as a streaming sercie. It’s dependencies on Amazon’s IT infrastructures and surging licensing fees are just some of the reasons why we don’t see a promising future for…