Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Can Apple Beat Spotify's First-Mover Advantage

2015 - 06 - 02

Apple, Feeling Heat From Spotify, to Offer Streaming Music Service

「With its dominant position in music threatened by a decline in download sales, Apple Inc.is preparing to launch a direct rival to Spotify AB and other popular services that let users stream songs instead of buy them.

The tech giant is betting that for the second time in as many decades it can persuade millions of people around the world to change how they listen to and pay for music. In 2003, the company’s iTunes Music Store made downloading individual songs the most common way for people to buy music—and made iTunes the biggest music retailer on the planet…….」

http://www.wsj.com/articles/apple-to-announce-new-music-services-1433183201?mod=LS1

「去年在iTunes上買音樂的人有一億一千萬,而每位客戶的平均年度消費金額略比$30多一點」
“Of the 110 million people who bought music on the iTunes Store last year, the average customer spent a little more than $30 over a 12-month period.”

看這個數據我們想想,Spotify現在有四千五百萬免費用戶、一千五百萬付費訂戶;而因為Apple看來和唱片公司已經打定主意要殺掉freemium模式了,那麼它究竟能創造多少$10/月的訂戶呢?

另外,關於音樂,我直覺上不看好Google;那是一家技術與商業模式很牛B的公司,但它並不以文化底蘊為立國基礎。

除了iTunes, KKBOX, 以及我們只專注在全球小眾的MUZIK Online,在音樂串流上我看不出來有誰真正賺得到錢。

Spotify這種每年虧上億美金、只是靠拱局滾資本財撐大泡沫的,和Amazon的級數還相差太遠。

Recommended article 

Three Objectives of Internal Controls

Each company has own objectives to accomplish. Common ones probably are the annual sales targets, the number of new businesses to expand, or something like that. 每一家企業都會有自己希望能夠達成的目標,最常聽聞的可能是希望今年的營業額達到多少、預計擴張幾家營業據點之類的。當然,公司有大有小,經營的項目也千奇百怪,各公司企業欲達到的目標自然也是推陳出新的了。 我們前面也提過了,內部控制制度就像是人穿的鞋子,不可能剛好符合每個人的腳,所以每雙鞋子會因應不同的需求來設計其功能及造型,有適合運動的、符合正式場合要求的、可以爬山的等等,但是不同功能的鞋子仍然具有鞋子的基本、共通的目標-保護你的腳。 不同公司企業間當然也有共通的目標了,像是賺錢、繼續生存就是每家企業都會有的目標。內部控制制度就是針對一些企業間共通的目標,來提供經營者控制企業活動的過程及方法。 COSO委員會所提出的內部控制三大目標,分別是營運的效果與效率、財務文件的正確性以及法令規範的遵循,以下這三大目標就是每一家企業都需要追求的目標。 (一)營運的效果與效率 當我們談到企業營運的「效果」,其實就是在談這家企業東西賣不賣的出去、賺不賺的到錢,營利是企業存在的最原始、最本質的目的了,縱然賺錢不是企業存在的唯一目的,也不能否認它的重要性。營運的效率則是指企業所掌握的資源(人力、時間、金錢、設備)是否被有效的利用。 舉例來說,今天有A、B兩家企業,當年淨獲利都是一億新台幣,我們會認為這兩家企業的營運是有效果的;而談到營運效率的時候我們可能會去觀察A、B的資本額以及員工人數多寡,發現A為資本額三千萬,30人的小型公司、B則是擁有五十億資本員工近千人的大企業,B相較於A就顯的相當的沒有效率。    由此可見,企業光是賺錢還不夠,企業還必需學習如何妥善的運用其所擁有的資源來提高利潤,企業的經營要效果與效率並重,這是內部控制制度非常關心的一個部份。 (二)財務文件的正確性…

The Medical Care Act - Missing The Point, Causing Disputes

Taiwan’s National Health Insurance is already the envy of the world. But the worsening relationships between doctors and patients and the shortage of doctors in major departments has also been the biggest threats. 台灣健保已是舉世稱羨之制度,但是,醫病關係之惡化、以及內外婦兒急五大科的醫師荒,也是目前台灣的重大隱憂。 冰凍三尺非一日之寒,化三尺之凍亦非旦夕之功。然而,一個根本搞不清楚方向的跛腳政府,卻為了曲意討好選民,推了「醫療糾紛處理及醫療事故補償法」(簡稱「醫糾法」),我們相信為其核心的強制調解的作法,等同頭痛醫腳,只會帶來催生糾紛、深化醫病對立之效果。 其實,回歸本質思考,這個影響社會安定至鉅、卻又莫衷一是的難題並非無解。我們非常市儈地認為,必須以「財源」之規劃作為核心,才不會治絲益棼。謹在此拋磚引玉,提出三個解決問題的思考方向(如下A, B, C三點),就教於各界。但在提出之前,必須先表明我們的五項認知基礎:…

Five Components of Internal Controls

Besides the three objectives, The COSO report also covers the five interconnected factors that constitute internal controls systems, which are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication and monitoring. (一)控制環境 COSO報告除了三大目標之外還提出了組成內部控制制度、彼此互相關聯的五大要素,分別是控制環境(control environment)、風險評估(risk assessment)、控制活動(control activities)、資訊與溝通(information…