Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Subscription Based OTT Services: Cancel Anytime

2018 - 02 - 01

“Kevin Clarkson subscribed to CBS’s All Access streaming TV service shortly before the network’s “Star Trek” reboot premiered in September. He plans to cancel it soon after the season finale.” – WSJ

Streaming service providers not only provide quality video content for their users but also impeccable customer service experiences, of which the freedom to cancel the subscriptions at any time becomes an essential part of their services.

This flexibility, unfortunately, leads to a higher level of cancellation rate than in traditional TV, of which usually requires an annual contract with a deposit of sort. Therefore, streaming service providers, especially subscription based like Netflix, need to spend more on customer retention and development, in the expectation many customers will leave anytime.

According to WSJ, Netflix loses about 7% of its subscribers each year, which is pretty low comparing to many other smaller service providers who can lose more than 50% per year. Although most streaming services are relatively inexpensive comparing to traditional cable, many subscribers still try to “gaming the system a bit”, such as password sharing and unsubscribing regularly.

We think that the core value of OTT services shall be bridging the supply and demand, not simply boosting paid members with negative cash flow. An OTT service provider should attract users with sufficient metadata and content,  and collects user behavior and data for advertisers to place more effective ads, the ad revenue shall then be shared with the original content provider. Because in essence, Google and Facebook make money from ads, not original content.

Source:  Streaming TV’s Problem: Subscribers Cancel Service When Their Favorite Shows Are Over – WSJ Business 

Recommended article 

India is Not the Savior for hTC

India, a country of 1.3 billion people but with $1000 GDP per capita, has been defined as low-income economy by Wold Bank. 鴻海在印度投資上看200億美元   「……國外媒體報導,鴻海董事長郭台銘已抵達印度,除與印度新創企業會面,也將拜訪印度官員;鴻海相繼攜手阿里巴巴、小米、軟銀前進印度投資,凸顯印度在政策引領印度製造(Made in India)以外,當地內需市場擴張,同步帶動科技業軟硬整合的新契機。印度媒體hindustantimes.com等昨(9)日引述消息人士的談話指出,鴻海在印度投資規模上看200億美元(約新台幣6,246億元),郭董率領40人的代表團前往印度考察,今天計劃拜訪印度通訊部長RaviShankar Prasad,有機會簽訂資訊合作案。…… 印度有13億人,和中國有拼,但人均GDP僅不過美元一千多,也被世界銀行定義為低收入經濟體。目前它的feature phone仍占六成,smartphone四成,內需市場的成長潛力雖不待言,但絕大多數人民所需用的手機都處於hTC不會有利潤的極低價格帶。 講低價,自然不能不講到鴻海。新任總理莫迪之競選承諾「印度製造、數位印度、潔淨印度」,配上鴻海在印度大佈局的思惟以及郭董這次揮軍印度的深度,遠遠不是只想「賣手機」的hTC所能想像。 當然,這個英語為官方語言之一的國家同樣有富裕階層,但他們心目中智慧機的高端產品,也是目前市占率還小贏hTC的Apple, Sony, 以及早已佈局在當地設了三座研發實驗室總共僱用一萬多名工程師掌握近三成市場的Samsung。 至於hTC目前在印度主攻的中階機呢?現在低價高規已成智慧機裡的全球主流;而這個擠得要命的區間裡有的是小米華為中興華碩,現在又加上了個大投資結合官方與印度業者會玩血洗市場策略的鴻海。

Netflix's Performance Continues to Decline

We have always held a pessimistic view on the future of Netflix. This article on Seeking Alpha provides a similar insight. 我們對Netflix的未來,向來不抱期待。讀者如果好奇,可以先看Seeking Alpha的這篇文章; Netflix: What Your Buyside Analyst Won’t Tell You 此篇重點,我們摘譯如下; 1. 在FANG四強中,Netflix的表現已難和其他三強相比。(FANG,包括Facebook, Amazon, Netflix,…

Three Objectives of Internal Controls

Each company has own objectives to accomplish. Common ones probably are the annual sales targets, the number of new businesses to expand, or something like that. 每一家企業都會有自己希望能夠達成的目標,最常聽聞的可能是希望今年的營業額達到多少、預計擴張幾家營業據點之類的。當然,公司有大有小,經營的項目也千奇百怪,各公司企業欲達到的目標自然也是推陳出新的了。 我們前面也提過了,內部控制制度就像是人穿的鞋子,不可能剛好符合每個人的腳,所以每雙鞋子會因應不同的需求來設計其功能及造型,有適合運動的、符合正式場合要求的、可以爬山的等等,但是不同功能的鞋子仍然具有鞋子的基本、共通的目標-保護你的腳。 不同公司企業間當然也有共通的目標了,像是賺錢、繼續生存就是每家企業都會有的目標。內部控制制度就是針對一些企業間共通的目標,來提供經營者控制企業活動的過程及方法。 COSO委員會所提出的內部控制三大目標,分別是營運的效果與效率、財務文件的正確性以及法令規範的遵循,以下這三大目標就是每一家企業都需要追求的目標。 (一)營運的效果與效率 當我們談到企業營運的「效果」,其實就是在談這家企業東西賣不賣的出去、賺不賺的到錢,營利是企業存在的最原始、最本質的目的了,縱然賺錢不是企業存在的唯一目的,也不能否認它的重要性。營運的效率則是指企業所掌握的資源(人力、時間、金錢、設備)是否被有效的利用。 舉例來說,今天有A、B兩家企業,當年淨獲利都是一億新台幣,我們會認為這兩家企業的營運是有效果的;而談到營運效率的時候我們可能會去觀察A、B的資本額以及員工人數多寡,發現A為資本額三千萬,30人的小型公司、B則是擁有五十億資本員工近千人的大企業,B相較於A就顯的相當的沒有效率。    由此可見,企業光是賺錢還不夠,企業還必需學習如何妥善的運用其所擁有的資源來提高利潤,企業的經營要效果與效率並重,這是內部控制制度非常關心的一個部份。 (二)財務文件的正確性…