Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Crypto - Fiat Financial Regulation

2018 - 09 - 07

Traditional financial institutions (e.g. banks) have been reluctant to work with cryptocurrencies and crypto businesses. Many banks treat crypto exchange businesses as high risk clients. In the end of last year, the Taiwanese Financial Supervisory Commission issued a public statement stated that banks and financial institutions shall not accept and exchange bitcoin, nor provide bitcoin service via ATM machines.

Anti-money laundering and fraud are the key factors to explain the banks’ conservative attitude towards crypto related businesses. However, being able to keep an account with a bank and use services provided by a bank is crucial for the continuation of an crypto business, particularly an exchange business. Here are 3 nations that take initiative to support crypto businesses when it comes to dealing with the banks.

Switzerland

Once known for its active and vibrant crypto industry, notably a “Crypto Valley” that supports over 200 crypto business entities, Switzerland is losing crypto businesses to offshore rivals due to hostile local banking relationships. Zuercher Kantonalbank (ZKB), the 4th largest Swiss bank, has closed the accounts of more than 20 crypto businesses. With more ICOs being issued in the nation, Swiss banks are worried that some ICOs would violate AML policies and put the banks at risk at the same time.

In order to restore the faith of a vibrant crypto industry and reassure the safety of local banks, Swiss Finance Minister Ueli Maurer step in and called for a meeting with the central bank and the bankers association to work on compiling a set a checks and conditions that all banks could follow when opening an account for crypto businesses.

Liechtenstein

Being the 6h smallest country in the world does not stop Liechtenstein from creating a welcoming environment for crypto businesses and fintech startups, in which the number of registered businesses are greater than its citizens.

Liechtenstein embraced more crypto businesses around the same time the Swiss started losing them. The reason why so many crypto businesses turned to Liechtenstein is the welcoming banking environment. Funds from ICOS are usually raised in crypto, such as bitcoin and ether, without exchanging them into fiat money the funds have very limited use in the broader economy. Nowadays, Bank Frick in Liechtenstein has become a popular choice for Swiss crypto businesses who struggled to secure a local account.

Some of the benefits that Liechtenstein offers include exemption from EU regulations while still trading across Europe due to financial passporting rules, low tax rate, and a friendly Blockchain Law ready to come into effect soon.

Israel

Bits of Gold, a local crypto exchange in Israel was denied banking service from Bank Leumi, one of the biggest banks in the country which the crypto exchange had held a account since 2014. In 2015, Bank Leumi decided to close its account despite the exchange’s lawful conduct. Since then, the exchange has been working with an injunction that allowed it to act until the final verdict. Recently, the Israeli Supreme Court passed a temporary order prohibiting Bank Leumi from blocking activities in Bits of Gold’s account.

“The Bank’s decision is based on the assumption that the Company’s activity does indeed entail risks that arise in violation of the provisions of the law, and therefore the Bank is liable to pay a price for the materialization of those risks. For over five years in which the account has been operating, these concerns have not materialized. as the District Court has determined, the company acted transparently and did not violate any provision of law.”

Recommended article 

Flaws in Compliance Regulations for Financial Sector

After a detail analysis of these 16 items for Financial Sector, we main regulations are as follows. 筆者综合分析這16則規範,其對於金融業應如何實施法令遵循ㄧ事,主要是作出下列要求: 設置遵守法令主管(compliance officer) 金融控股公司內部控制及稽核制度實施辦法要求公司必須建立遵守法令主管制度,指定一隸屬於董事會或總經理之單位,負責制度之規劃、管理及執行,並指派高階主管一人擔任遵守法令主管,綜理法令遵循事務,至少每半年向董事會及監察人報告2。 遵守法令單位應辦理事項 建立清楚適當之法令傳達、諮詢、協調與溝通系統。 確認各項作業及管理規章均配合相關法規適時更新,使各項營運活動 符合法令規定。 訂定法令遵循之自行查核及評估內容與程序,並督導各單位定期自行 查核執行情形。 對各單位人員施以適當合宜之法規訓練3。 自行查核法令遵循作業 金融控股公司自行查核法令遵循作業,每半年至少須辦理一次,其辦理結果應送遵守法令單位備查。各單位辦理自行查核作業,應由該單位主管指定專人辦理4。 上述的「設置遵守法令主管」、「遵守法令單位應辦理事項」以及「自行查核法令遵循作業」是這16則規範當中關於法令遵循的最主要規定,當然不同事業種類之規範各有細微之不同,不過都不超出這幾個方面。唯一值得注意的是,針對保險業,主管機關在「保險業內部控制及稽核制度實施辦法」當中有針對「法令遵循制度」5、「法令遵循計畫」6與「法令遵循手冊」7作出較為明確的綱要性要求,在此即不加以贅述。 前述的金融產業相關規範當中所提供之法令遵循計畫作法,大多是要求企業必須建立一個直接隸屬於董事會或總經理之遵守法令單位,並且指派高階主管擔任法令遵循主管,綜理法律遵循事務與負責法令遵循制度之規劃、管理與執行,也都有列舉出法令遵循單位必須辦理之事項,以及每半年必須自行評估其法令遵循計畫之執行成效,並且保留相關工作底稿等等。 本書認為,這些看似具體的法令遵循計畫規範的確是可以給各公司指出一個大概的方向,讓公司企業得以依此方向去實施自己的法令遵循計畫,但是這些規範都還是漏掉了一個重點,這個重點就是企業內部的「文件」,文件的管理不僅在內部控制制度上佔據核心的地位,在法令的遵循上一樣是關鍵中的關鍵,最大的原因在於,企業的任何商業活動都會以文件的方式呈現,這些文件就是執行法令遵循計畫的最佳著力點,若相關的法令遵循計畫規範不能夠抓到這個重點的話,其規範不管如何去制定,其效果都相當有限。為了避免企業一再不慎違法、也為了要使有能力為企業判斷商業行為有無違法之虞之人士得以即時接觸重要文件,法令遵循之法律規範應該要加入文件管理的機制方為妥適。 參考資料: 1. 由於各規範內所要求建立之法令遵循計畫大同小異,所以本文主要以金融控股公司內部控制及稽核制度實施辦法之內容做說明,若有其他特殊之規範才會另外列出。…

Microsoft & Uber finally face the facts and change their Strategies

Dara Khosrowshahi, an Iranian-American and the CEO of Uber, rolled out a new set of cultural norms, including one that states, “We Do the Right Thing.” Following last year’s decision by the London regulator, he flew…

Is Amazon a Tough Competitor for Google's Search / Ad?

When you have a specific product in mind, do you go on Amazon or Google? 當你有特定領域的需求(比方說,要上網買東西)時,是先上Amazon找、還是去Google? 電子商務調研公司BloomReach近期在線上訪問了2000位網購者。結果顯示:在尋找一項商品時,有超過55%會直接前往Amazon,比去年成長了11%。消費者也不再偏好搜尋引擎來尋找商品,從去年的34%直落到今年的28%。Google在這點上,持續敗給Amazon,而且看來差距還愈來愈大。這部分的廣告收入,亦然。 9 in 10 consumers will check Amazon even if they find a product they want on another retailer’s site…