Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Crypto - Fiat Financial Regulation

2018 - 09 - 07

Traditional financial institutions (e.g. banks) have been reluctant to work with cryptocurrencies and crypto businesses. Many banks treat crypto exchange businesses as high risk clients. In the end of last year, the Taiwanese Financial Supervisory Commission issued a public statement stated that banks and financial institutions shall not accept and exchange bitcoin, nor provide bitcoin service via ATM machines.

Anti-money laundering and fraud are the key factors to explain the banks’ conservative attitude towards crypto related businesses. However, being able to keep an account with a bank and use services provided by a bank is crucial for the continuation of an crypto business, particularly an exchange business. Here are 3 nations that take initiative to support crypto businesses when it comes to dealing with the banks.


Once known for its active and vibrant crypto industry, notably a “Crypto Valley” that supports over 200 crypto business entities, Switzerland is losing crypto businesses to offshore rivals due to hostile local banking relationships. Zuercher Kantonalbank (ZKB), the 4th largest Swiss bank, has closed the accounts of more than 20 crypto businesses. With more ICOs being issued in the nation, Swiss banks are worried that some ICOs would violate AML policies and put the banks at risk at the same time.

In order to restore the faith of a vibrant crypto industry and reassure the safety of local banks, Swiss Finance Minister Ueli Maurer step in and called for a meeting with the central bank and the bankers association to work on compiling a set a checks and conditions that all banks could follow when opening an account for crypto businesses.


Being the 6h smallest country in the world does not stop Liechtenstein from creating a welcoming environment for crypto businesses and fintech startups, in which the number of registered businesses are greater than its citizens.

Liechtenstein embraced more crypto businesses around the same time the Swiss started losing them. The reason why so many crypto businesses turned to Liechtenstein is the welcoming banking environment. Funds from ICOS are usually raised in crypto, such as bitcoin and ether, without exchanging them into fiat money the funds have very limited use in the broader economy. Nowadays, Bank Frick in Liechtenstein has become a popular choice for Swiss crypto businesses who struggled to secure a local account.

Some of the benefits that Liechtenstein offers include exemption from EU regulations while still trading across Europe due to financial passporting rules, low tax rate, and a friendly Blockchain Law ready to come into effect soon.


Bits of Gold, a local crypto exchange in Israel was denied banking service from Bank Leumi, one of the biggest banks in the country which the crypto exchange had held a account since 2014. In 2015, Bank Leumi decided to close its account despite the exchange’s lawful conduct. Since then, the exchange has been working with an injunction that allowed it to act until the final verdict. Recently, the Israeli Supreme Court passed a temporary order prohibiting Bank Leumi from blocking activities in Bits of Gold’s account.

“The Bank’s decision is based on the assumption that the Company’s activity does indeed entail risks that arise in violation of the provisions of the law, and therefore the Bank is liable to pay a price for the materialization of those risks. For over five years in which the account has been operating, these concerns have not materialized. as the District Court has determined, the company acted transparently and did not violate any provision of law.”

Recommended article 

June 4, Special and Indeed Controversial

Two days ago, news coverages in the Greater China region all focused on the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, in a cohesive and almost obnoxiously repetitive manner. Yet, all the way across the pacific ocean, major news…

Searching Legal Database (Part 1 - Abstract Thinking)

To be a well-rounded corporate lawyer, young lawyers need to excel at searching legal databases. But sometimes, even graduating from a first-tier law school doesn’t give you a head start at that. Why? Continue reading


In around 4 months after Enron filed for bankruptcy, WorldCom was also reported for false accounting fraud. There are many tricks in accounting to create false financial reports. 恩龍公司聲請破產保護大約四個月後,世界通訊公司也發生了會計作帳不實的醜聞,利用會計手法作假帳的方式有許多種,恩龍公司與這裡的世界通訊公司雖然都是利用會計作帳不實而引發之醜聞,但是不同的地方在於,恩龍公司是利用許多的關係企業進行複雜的「資產負債表外交易」來隱匿公司的巨額負債及虧損;世界通訊公司則僅是單純的運用會計手法,將費用支出轉列為資本支出,虛增公司的獲利所引發的醜聞。 世界通訊公司原名為長途電話折扣服務公司(Long Distance Discount Service),於1980年代創立,1995年才更名為世界通訊公司(WroldCom Inc.)。業務範圍包含當地、長途電話以及全球網際網路服務。2001年時世界通訊於全世界六十五個國家有營業據點,年營業額達數百億美元,在當時為全世界最大的網際網路骨幹。 世界通訊在短期內能成為全美第二大的長途電話公司,主要的原因是不斷的併購其他的公司來擴大自身的營業規模。於1990年代末期就已經進行了60次以上的併購行為。 然後過多的併購行為所帶來的問題,是公司內部系統與客戶資料的整合困難,電腦計費系統常常會超收費用使顧客抱怨連連,另外公司高層主管有跟公司貸款數億美元之情形發生。…