Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Corporate Lawyers' Business Development

2017 - 05 - 09

2017.05.09

It is reported that recent judicial reform propositions in Taiwan have sparked controversies among legal professions. As the result, the number of retiring judges and prosecutors has increased this year and is expected to grow rapidly in the future.

Most judges and prosecutors, after leaving their public service, continue their legal careers as attorneys. This makes the already saturated legal-service market even more competitive. Many young legal professionals find it difficult to survive, let alone making decent livings. At eCounsel Group, a rather large emphasis on self-improvement and personal growth for young talents has been placed. Though it is never too late to learn, we understand that one may very well feel worn out having constantly to acquire new skills while shouldering even greater personal plus family responsibilities associated with his aging.

When the supply of a product exceeds the demand, the pressure to reduce price takes place in order to make the product more attractive. The legal service market certainly is no exception. As a result, young lawyers need to differentiate themselves through advanced knowledge of subjects other than simply the law.

Since early this year, our in-house training program “eCounsel Read” has been implemented with the focus on studying “the news, the law and the business model” in depth. The program not only helps build a stronger team within eCounsel Group’s affiliated companies, but also equips our lawyers with cross-disciplinary knowledge and social skills necessary when taking on more challenging tasks. At eCounsel Group, tremendous efforts are dedicated to design an effective and rewarding development scheme.

The undeniable fact is that the number of lawyers has skyrocketed in both Taiwan and elsewhere in the wolrd. With the proliferating advancement of artificial intelligence, it is foreseeable that many jobs in the legal service industry will be essentially replaced by robots. Fortunately, skilled lawyers with interdisciplinary backgrounds are still in great demand.

Sources:
商務律師 (iv):再談法律專業與商業
「前途堪慮」 法官、檢察官爆離退潮

Recommended article 

Crypto - Fiat Financial Regulation

Traditional financial institutions (e.g. banks) have been reluctant to work with cryptocurrencies and crypto businesses. Many banks treat crypto exchange businesses as high risk clients. In the end of last year, the Taiwanese Financial Supervisory Commission…

Consequence of No Document Management

Take the case of Lee and Li for example, the document that plays the critical role is the full authorization from San Disk. 以理律案為例,案中扮演關鍵腳色的文件是新帝公司的全權授權書,身處工商業發達、金融市場交易頻繁的年代,各銀行、證券商莫不是「認文件不認人」,要辦任何手續可以,先看有無相關所需文件,匯款要匯款單、開戶要開戶約定書、劉偉杰要代替新帝公司開戶則是需要新帝公司的全權委託書才行,否則劉根本無法動用證券帳戶內屬於新帝公司的聯電股票,更別提將其賣出換錢了。 要是有了文件管理系統,制度設計上應該要讓理律指派另一個較高階的主管與劉偉杰共同處理新帝相關事務,而不管是開戶、提領股票或是賣出股票都必須要兩個人的簽名或蓋章,而規定高階主管在簽名時就必須將文件儲存至文件管理系統內,此交易文件即可在第一時間被稽核人員來勾稽,任何不法行為都將無所遁形。 再看看國票案,楊瑞仁的計策之所以奏效,最大的功臣是他在公司電腦系統上製作的假成交單以及假收付款憑證,如果沒有這兩種文件,台灣銀行以及國票總公司還會被騙嗎?前面也說過了,認文件不認人是當今交易常態,沒有恰當文件,一切免談! 最後,從金管會對於博達公司委託之會計師事務所所為之處分書可以得知,從檢調單位查扣的資料當中顯示,會計師在查核博達公司的銀行存款與巨額收支時缺乏相關的原始憑證(銀行匯款通知書、銀行傳票所附憑證),未選取適當樣本抽核1;以及會計師在查核銷或代理商變動時,僅詢問博達公司之經理人及核對博達提供之代理商基本資料與信用評估表及採信,並未盡其專業之注意義務2。 從上述的處分書當中我們都清楚觀察到,文件的缺乏不但造成會計師查核簽證上的困難,也會造成受查公司容易出現規避相關必要規範的情形,終至弊案一發不可收拾,一套好的文件管理系統即可以防止此類情形的發生。 除此之外,依據「公開發行公司取得或處分資產處理準則」第10條規定:「公開發行公司取得或處分有價證券,應先取具標的公司最近期經會計師查 核簽證或核閱之財務報表作為評估交易價格之參考,另交易金額達公司實 收資本額百分之二十或新臺幣三億元以上者,應洽請會計師就交易價格之 合理性表示意見。」依據審計準則公報第23號,像博達案當中出售貨款債權的附條件交易,應屬於或有事項3,查核或有事項時若發現有不符合財務會計準則公報第9號或是無法查獲相關證據時,都必須出具保留意見之查核報告。 如果有一套好的文件管理系統,這些專業人士所出具之意見書、查核報告即可以立即進入文件管理系統,在相關事項的溝通與監督上都會非常有效率。 1. 違反會計師查核簽證財務報表規則第20第1款第10目。 2.…

Waterland Securities (Part 2)

The process of the crime has two steps, the first step is: “Fake Transaction, Real Transition”. 楊瑞仁的犯罪過程可以分為兩個部驟,第一個部份是「假交易,真入帳」。楊瑞仁為了取信於台灣銀行信託部[2],楊瑞仁於上班前、下班後利用公司電腦列印出不實交易成交單並且刪除電腦紀錄,使台銀看到交易單而買進楊瑞仁的偽造商業本票,然後將資金匯入國票在台銀所開的帳戶。但是這個帳戶是國票的並不是楊瑞仁所能控制,所以他還需要另一個步驟來把資金從國票的帳戶裡面套出來。 為了要把國票總公司銀行帳戶裡面的錢轉到自己的互頭裡面,楊瑞仁想了另一個辦法,就是要使國票總公司「誤認銀行帳戶中的錢是客戶的錢」。因為國票有一種業務項目是為「附買回交易」[3],而在這種交易當中,投資人提前解約是非常常見的(可能因為資金調度需求),一旦投資人解除契約國票當然得把投資人所附的價金還給投資人,楊瑞仁便是看準「國票必須在投資人解除附買回交易約定時將錢匯還給投資人」的這一點而加以利用。 再加上這些台銀所支付國票的款項,楊瑞仁知道國票總公司不會詳細的核對每一筆交易的細節(台銀匯款給國票時匯款單上匯款人欄裡面寫的是台銀,而非楊瑞仁的人頭戶的名子,如果有稍微核對匯款人的名稱,就可以發現根本沒有附買回交易之存在),而只會核對交易總金額,所以他利用偽造的收付款憑單(一樣利用公司沒人的時候利用電腦列印、做完刪除電腦上的記錄)成功使國票誤信該款項是客戶與國票達成「附買回交易」所付之款項(其實根本沒有交易),而楊瑞仁隔兩天再對公司解除契約,國票公司便把戶頭裡面的錢匯入楊的人頭戶,這樣的「假交易,真洗錢」就讓楊瑞仁獲得了巨額資金。 參考資料: 1. 楊瑞仁實際向台灣銀行信託部詐取的金額高達98億元,而於1995年當時國票公司的實收資本只有110億左右(2006年資本額已經達到約180億),換言之楊瑞仁所詐騙的金額可能快要超過國票公司的所有資產了!且國票是上市公司,其所保證在外流通之商業本票高達一千億元,此案影響層面極廣,不但包含票券業更囊括股市,造成金融市場動蕩。 2. 此時台灣銀行等於是一個投資人的角色,透過票券買賣的方式台灣銀行可以將其閒置資金移轉至需求資金的公司,台灣銀行則從中賺取利息收入。 3. 附買回交易,是指票券交易商(如本案中的國票公司)與投資人訂定的一種附條件交易,交易商將票券賣給投資人,同時約定「一定期間」後賣方必須以「約定價額」(通常是本金加上利息)贖回該票券。對於買進票券的投資人來說此交易之功能類似短期存款,可以賺取利潤,對於交易商來說則是可以方便其資金調度。