Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Not so Dumb Pipes: Net Neutrality Dead, AT&T-Time Warner Deal

2018 - 06 - 13

 

The dumb pipes are not so dumb with two historic moments taken place this week.

Broadband providers have long been referred to as the dumb pipes/dumb network for not having any input into what data their users are transferring through their “pipes”. The Obama-Era Net Neutrality Rules required that internet service providers to treat web content equally. Those rules officially died on Monday this week and ends the agency’s prohibitions against internet service providers blocking, slowing down, or providing preferential treatment to a specific online site/service.

Also happened this week is the landmark AT&T acquisition of Time Warner, the later owns media properties including HBO, CNN, Cartoon Network and TBS. The acquisition deal went through a long hurdle with the Justice Department since two years ago with concerns over antitrust issues. After the most recent six-week trial, Judge Richard Leon handed AT&T a victory on Tuesday and approved its $85 billion acquisition deal.

“AT&T says acquiring Time Warner is a central part of its plan to compete with the likes of Facebook and Google for advertising dollars. It wants to use Time Warner’s content to build a new ad platform that can deliver targeted commercials based on the customer’s viewing preferences and personal data.”

The same day (10.22.2016) AT&T announced plans to acquire Time Warner, Donald Trump, then a presidential candidate, pledged to block this deal when elected.

Will the POTUS do anything?  We shall wait and see.  

.

Souce:

The FCC’s net neutrality rules are officially repealed today. Here’s what that really means

Recommended article 

Alphabet Drones to Deliver Burritos

Starting from this month, Google has started to test out sending meals using its droves to Virginia Tech. Without a e-commerce sector in its business, what is Google planning to do with this test? 這個月,Google開始小規模的嘗試用無人機配送餐點到Virginia Tech這所大學。Google沒有Amazon的電商佈局,跳下來玩這個,圖的是什麼?…

Internal Control Systems : Born With Flaws (Part 3)

Corporations create affiliated companies for synergy, business development or horizontal and vertical integration. But they seldom take the operations of the affiliated companies into account then designing the internal control systems. 內控機制的先天缺陷-關係企業之內部控制遭到忽略 公司為了水平整合、垂直整合、綜效考量及業務拓展等因素經常必須設立關係企業,但是部分公司在設計內部控制制度時未將關係企業的整體營運活動一同考量,容易造成內控的漏洞。實務上,時有母公司未於內部控制制度中訂定子公司的內部控制作業、未督促子公司建立內部控制制度、亦未對子公司執行稽核作業。 某些上市、上櫃公司因為經營規模龐大,通常都在國外擁有關係企業,但是因為語言因素以及管理成本之考量,對於關係企業的內部控制要求僅止於案時提供其財務報表,方便總公司編制聯合財報。如此一來,縱使企業有良好的內部控制制度,若未確實要求關係企業遵循,也是枉然。總公司內稽人員只能以書面方式複核關係企業所給予之內控自評結果,效果有限。 關係企業的內部控制制度如果被忽略也會造成嚴重的後果。首先,關係企業營運的好壞會影響到企業本身,不論是在投資的獲利方面或是商譽方面都有舉足輕重的影響,若是因為關係企業營運上出差錯,企業本身也會因此受牽連。除此之外,一定規模以上的企業每年都必須請會計師簽證期財務報表,而公開發行公司也必須製作關係企業的聯合財報。舉例來說,資產負債表是財務報表之其中一種,必須經過會計師簽證的,而關係企業在資產負債表上是以長期股權投資的項目來呈現,如果會計師想了解該表上長期股權投資損益數字的正確性,則勢必必須也去了解關係企業的財務報表及相關內部控制制度。 縱使關係企業有了內部控制制度,也還沒完!總公司在查核關係企業、分公司或其他營業據點之工作上仍然會有實際上無法解決的齟齬。以下以證券商查核公司之實務為例:…

Waterland Securities (Part 2)

The process of the crime has two steps, the first step is: “Fake Transaction, Real Transition”. 楊瑞仁的犯罪過程可以分為兩個部驟,第一個部份是「假交易,真入帳」。楊瑞仁為了取信於台灣銀行信託部[2],楊瑞仁於上班前、下班後利用公司電腦列印出不實交易成交單並且刪除電腦紀錄,使台銀看到交易單而買進楊瑞仁的偽造商業本票,然後將資金匯入國票在台銀所開的帳戶。但是這個帳戶是國票的並不是楊瑞仁所能控制,所以他還需要另一個步驟來把資金從國票的帳戶裡面套出來。 為了要把國票總公司銀行帳戶裡面的錢轉到自己的互頭裡面,楊瑞仁想了另一個辦法,就是要使國票總公司「誤認銀行帳戶中的錢是客戶的錢」。因為國票有一種業務項目是為「附買回交易」[3],而在這種交易當中,投資人提前解約是非常常見的(可能因為資金調度需求),一旦投資人解除契約國票當然得把投資人所附的價金還給投資人,楊瑞仁便是看準「國票必須在投資人解除附買回交易約定時將錢匯還給投資人」的這一點而加以利用。 再加上這些台銀所支付國票的款項,楊瑞仁知道國票總公司不會詳細的核對每一筆交易的細節(台銀匯款給國票時匯款單上匯款人欄裡面寫的是台銀,而非楊瑞仁的人頭戶的名子,如果有稍微核對匯款人的名稱,就可以發現根本沒有附買回交易之存在),而只會核對交易總金額,所以他利用偽造的收付款憑單(一樣利用公司沒人的時候利用電腦列印、做完刪除電腦上的記錄)成功使國票誤信該款項是客戶與國票達成「附買回交易」所付之款項(其實根本沒有交易),而楊瑞仁隔兩天再對公司解除契約,國票公司便把戶頭裡面的錢匯入楊的人頭戶,這樣的「假交易,真洗錢」就讓楊瑞仁獲得了巨額資金。 參考資料: 1. 楊瑞仁實際向台灣銀行信託部詐取的金額高達98億元,而於1995年當時國票公司的實收資本只有110億左右(2006年資本額已經達到約180億),換言之楊瑞仁所詐騙的金額可能快要超過國票公司的所有資產了!且國票是上市公司,其所保證在外流通之商業本票高達一千億元,此案影響層面極廣,不但包含票券業更囊括股市,造成金融市場動蕩。 2. 此時台灣銀行等於是一個投資人的角色,透過票券買賣的方式台灣銀行可以將其閒置資金移轉至需求資金的公司,台灣銀行則從中賺取利息收入。 3. 附買回交易,是指票券交易商(如本案中的國票公司)與投資人訂定的一種附條件交易,交易商將票券賣給投資人,同時約定「一定期間」後賣方必須以「約定價額」(通常是本金加上利息)贖回該票券。對於買進票券的投資人來說此交易之功能類似短期存款,可以賺取利潤,對於交易商來說則是可以方便其資金調度。