Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

The Hypocrisy of Apple in Communist China

2017 - 12 - 05

“We believe that our presence in China helps promote greater openness and facilitates the free flow of ideas and information… We are convinced that Apple can best promote fundamental rights, including the right of free expression, by being engaged even where we may disagree with a particular country’s law.” – Cynthia Hogan, Vice President for Public Policy and Government Affairs, Apple Inc. 11/02/2017

This year, Apple has removed hundreds of apps from its China Appstore under the Chinese government’s recent attempt to strengthen its notorious Great Firewall. The hundreds of removed apps include a significant number of 674 VPN services and one of the biggest communication service, Skype. Apple’s compliance with the local cyber security rules can be linked to its newly established iCloud data centre in Guizhou, China, of which would not be possible had Apple actively rejected China’s censorship.

Apple’s removal of apps not only alienate some developers, but also two U.S. senators, Patrick Leahy and Ted Cruz, who publicly asked Apple to push back against censorship in China.

In response to the senators’ letter, Apple claimed that not only does the Appstore remain a “powerful platform for human experssion…” without these hundreds of removed apps, but also that Apple can do a better job promoting human rights “by being engaged even where we may disagree with a particular country’s law.”

We find this response to be an utter hypocrisy as more than 1/5 of all Apple’s profits come from China and that the communist nation is the tech giant’s second-largest market. It would be a business suicide for Apple to disaffect the communist party for causes like human rights and freedom of speech, of which are great principles but not business savvy.

Last month China’s Tencent surpassed Facebook in valuation and became the first Asian tech firm to reach $500 billion. The growth of Tencent also made its founder, Pony Ma, richer than Google’s Larry Page and Sergey Brin, while both Google and Facebook are still blocked in China. The take-home message here can be summarised in one sentence:  Show your unquestionable loyalty to the party, and we make you the richest man in the world.

Sources:

China’s Tencent surpasses Facebook in valuation a day after breaking $500 billion barrier – CNBC

Apple’s decision to remove VPN apps from the App Store in China explained by Tim Cook – INDEPENDENT

 

Recommended article 

Crooked Construction Firms(Part 2)

追訴法律責任?大家別傻了。 一案建商,遠比消費者、比政府更精於算計,要比奸比賤,我們是贏不了的。 曾有律師投書向媒體表示:「像這種法律責任事沒有時效消滅的問題,就算公司結束了還是可以追究負責人。」 我們不這麼樂觀。 建案完銷,股東把賺的錢分一分,公司就辦停業或解散,你覺得董事長或總經理還會把錢留在身上、把財產放自己名下,等著將來自己起的樓被發現是海砂屋、或輕輕一震房子就倒時,供屆時賠償之用? 也許讀者認為可以用刑事責任逼他們展現誠意? 可預見的狀況是:賠償金十億,而這些不良建商負責人被法院以業務過失致死判二年,最後關個一年半就假釋在外。 或是開公司期間,這些建商的董事長和總經理,根本是每個月領三萬元車馬費的人頭? 那要不要再出個殺手鐧,立法禁止任何一個建商在房子蓋好後到住戶同意非因瑕疵而拆屋重建(例如都更)前,全部售屋所得均不得以股利或任何其他模式處分掉、更不准解散清算?(能想得出這種橋段的人肯定不知道憲法上的平等權和財產權保障是什麼意思) 故此,這幾十年來台灣建築業生態上常見的現象該如何解套,請見下篇「民刑事責任,對掃蕩瑕疵建案毫無幫助」。

Taiwan's National Health Insurance Is Not That Bad

There are indeed problems with our health insurance, problems that affects healthcare quality and equality among all classes in our society. 無助的美國健康保險系統 「……美國健康保險制度五花八門,基本上都是民營的,政府辦理的只有窮人保險(Medicaid),政府辦理的保險很多醫生不參加,因為給付額度很低,而民間的健康保險制度非常複雜,同一家公司有HMO(管理式)、PPO(直接或自由式)等不同計畫……隨著經濟不景氣,越來越多人沒有健康保險,就會造成一個很大的醫療風暴,很多醫院關門,影響急難救助……。」 http://ppt.cc/2ZB5 健保的問題大,我瞭解。但是,大到影響我們社會裡各階級之就醫與保健權益、醫藥界等產業鏈的財富分配與人才養成,只靠著訴諸情緒而不探究問題本源的謾罵,只讓人覺得可惜。甚至有些人對於學名藥的講法,像極了為原廠藥在煽動民眾對政府施壓,對於體系性地解決問題毫無助益,可嘆。 這篇用生活化的口語說明美國的醫療保險制度,值得朋友們參考。 文章裡缺的,是處方藥有關的問題(總之,在美國拿到處方箋後,病人到藥局買藥時需自付的co-payment多半很高)。 凡讀過相關議題報導的都知道,美國的醫療(暨相關私人保險)制度與各種收費模式,即便對中產階級而言,都算得上是一大負擔,失業期間就更別提了,就醫的基本人權,僅不過是窮人的口號。此外,更有數千萬美國人,長年因為工作關係(例如:臨時性打工、或其雇主因財務考量而未提供等之情形。),根本連醫療保險都沒有,一旦生病,除非口袋有錢或四處告貸,否則只能勉強忍病不就醫。 反觀這些情況若發生在台灣呢? 制度要改善,沒有人會反對。請先衡平審視自己,才不會淪為痴人妄語。

The 4 Skills Every Super Manager Should Have: English, Law, Finance and Taxation

Amazon is profitable, Facebook is not, not in the financial report in recent years. Amazon有獲利,FB沒有, 這幾年財報上可不是這麼說的! 財務報表,是依據一堆會計師、律師和政客,在壓力團體遊說下,遍經詭算而設計出來之遊戲規則所編製的。這些規則的演化,當然有其成因,要是對其來龍去脈不瞭解,絕對沒辦法參透大人世界裡的生意經。 Amazon Is Profitable, Facebook Is Not GAAP accounting can sometimes wrongly favor acquisitions over internal development. Comparing Amazon to…