Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

On Netflix's Growth

2015 - 09 - 21

Sell Netflix : Projected Growth Is Not Impressive Enough 

Summary

Netflix’s increased cost of international expansion has resulted in a substantial decline in earnings growth, yet the company’s stock price has risen dramatically.

Analysts are confident about the company’s ability to achieve growth by tapping into international markets, yet the growth for subscribers projected is not higher than past growth experienced.

Netflix is extremely overvalued and a risky portfolio holding. I am bearish on most US-listed equity anyway, but found this to be a stronger case worth noting.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/3521666-sell-netflix-projected-growth-impressive-enough

 

我和作者結論一致,但觀點不同,我認為Netflix發展走下坡的原因者要有四個:

  • 授權壓力:

這是Netflix永遠揮之不去的夢魘,每回談判都被迫在內容提供商日漸高漲的授權金要求上鬼打牆,這次就失去了變形金剛;而它的自產內容還連1%都不到

  • 內容不足:

缺運動賽事、新聞(這兩種Netflix要補進來難度很高,畢竟各地MSO, 以及Comcast, Warner, Disney這些都不是好說話的大咖)、不少電影和電視劇仍須走DVD郵寄租借的老路(這點Amazon早已解決,已能在線上以串流方式租或購)。

  • OTT的轉換成本低:

Netflix不像Amazon在穩居全球最大電商之地位外,所額外加入的Prime membership(這一包US$99/yr的會員權益裡,除了和Netflix一樣的video streaming外,更包括快速到貨免運費、Kindle借書看報有限免費、數百萬首音樂隨選串流全部免費、雲端所有照片儲存免費)形成穩固的生態系。Netflix靠著每月US$7.99幾無利潤之超低價集客(它的財報上主要利潤都來自於DVD郵寄租借),但這樣的OTT客戶說轉就轉,我目前看不出Hastings能怎樣鼓勵效忠。

  • 目前還被自己競爭對手Amazon的AWS綁死:

Netflix不夠宅,在雲技術的底層能力太弱,又急於全球擴張必須考慮CDN,這些問題恐怕讓它幾年內都無法自立,在IaaS及PaaS上的支出亦為隱憂。

Recommended article 

Trucks v.s Drones

Let’s see if this article from Insider makes any sense? 我們來看看Insider這篇文章到底合不合理? 無人機送貨純為噱頭?成本為快遞一萬倍 送貨成本計算:(能源成本 + 操作人員成本 + 載具費用攤提) 這個基本公式,不論用卡車或是無人機,都一體適用。從Amazon日漸廣佈的fulfillment center送貨到客戶那兒,Prime二天、Prime Now二小時、再進到將來Prime Air以半小時為目標;其同時、同路線的出貨數量都趨於靈活之小量,大型貨車根本使不上力。用無人機,會比起用卡車的單趟人力貴,我都高度懷疑了,還一萬倍? 送貨的能源成本:卡車 vs. 無人機 每英哩,卡車是 $0.5 而無人機只要 $0.02。所以,混用卡車和無人機來完成送貨到府,就能大幅降低亞馬遜必須支出的運費 the fuel cost of running a diesel-powered truck…

Pardon Power isn't All That Powerful

The United States Constitution grants the POTUS the pardon power for federal crimes and state offences recognizable under state criminal law. “But issuing pardons to his own friends, associates and relatives could be a perilous path for…
High User Experience Design

High User Experience Design

Style never met and those among great. At no or september sportsmen he perfectly happiness attending. Depending listening delivered off new she procuring satisfied sex existence. Person plenty answer to exeter it if. Law use assistance…