Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Apple Music – Hitting the Wall Before Hitting the Shelves

2015 - 06 - 12

Apple Music under antitrust scrutiny  

「The attorneys general of New York and Connecticut are now investigatingwhether the deals struck by Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) for its new music service violated antitrust rules.

The joint investigation will probe whether Apple pressured music labels – or whether the labels conspired with Apple and one another – to withdraw support for popular “freemium” services like Spotify in favor of its new paid streaming music service.

Eric Schneiderman and Connecticut’s George Jepsen were also among a group of attorneys generals who in 2013 sued Apple for conspiring to raise the prices of e-books. Apple agreed to pay $450M as part of that settlement.」

http://seekingalpha.com/news/2571016-apple-music-under-antitrust-scrutiny

在我的〔Apple Music 來勢猛暴〕裡就提到這個產品可能會有違反公平交易相關法令的問題,然後就看到這則新聞了。

紐約州和康乃迪克州的檢察總長聯手,對Apple啟動反壟斷的調查,要瞭解Apple有無壓迫唱片公司(或唱片公司有無與Apple共謀)撤回對於如Spotify之業者的廣告支持的免費音樂(freemium)模式,以利自家的付費音樂串流服務的發展。這兩位檢察總長也在2013年時對Apple在e-book抬價案起訴,該案中Apple賠了4.5億美元的和解金。

姑不論iPod的精神意義,Apple這局玩很大(在100個國家要同時開台)、錢砸很多(光買Beats就花了美金30億,而我從Spotify付給Sony的數字來預測,光為美國加拿大的兩地授權,Apple每年的預付權利金恐怕也得接近美金1億),會不會隨便做一做看看沒啥起色就收攤?如果不會,那它可能祭出的手段難道只有把freemium給殺了嗎?

再加上,Apple裡主導這個產品的都是重量級的資深音樂人,他們與唱片界的淵源,遠比大多數的串流業者要深。聚在一塊兒,不多搞些小陰謀,你信?

Recommended article 

Other Cases

Besides the criminal law, corporate law, securities and exchange act, patent law, and fair trade act, there are many laws that are highly important to business owners. 除了本書前面章節裡面談到的刑法、公司法、證券交易法、專利法與公平交易法之外,與公司負責人息息相關的法律還有許多種1,舉幾個例子來說: 勞工安全衛生法(技術性) 勞工安全衛生法之立法目的在於防止職業災害,保障勞工安全與健康2,如該法規定雇主應該要設置必要的安全衛生設備防止特定災害之發生3,還有像是如果是具有危險系的機器設備則是需要經過主管機關之檢查合格後才可以使用4,若違反這些規定而發生職業災害的話就要負擔刑事責任5。 稅捐稽徵法(抽象) 人民都有納稅的義務,各企業行號當然也必須依照稅捐稽徵法之規定繳納各種稅捐,如果納稅義務人有使用詐術或其他不正之方法逃漏稅捐者,依稅捐稽徵法第41條之規定就有五年以下的有期徒刑還可能併科六萬元以下之罰金! 企業都要節稅,但是正當與不正當就會有天差地別的後果。 商業會計法(技術) 商業會計法則是規範公司行號當中的各種會計事務之法規,因為企業的各種財務報對於國家整體的經濟與廣大的投資人來說都有深遠的影響,其重要性不言可喻,所以如果企業的商業負責人或是會計人員有不實製作、銷毀或是偽造變造各種會計表冊時也負擔刑事責任6。 消費者保護法(技術)…

The Medical Care Act - Missing The Point, Causing Disputes

Taiwan’s National Health Insurance is already the envy of the world. But the worsening relationships between doctors and patients and the shortage of doctors in major departments has also been the biggest threats. 台灣健保已是舉世稱羨之制度,但是,醫病關係之惡化、以及內外婦兒急五大科的醫師荒,也是目前台灣的重大隱憂。 冰凍三尺非一日之寒,化三尺之凍亦非旦夕之功。然而,一個根本搞不清楚方向的跛腳政府,卻為了曲意討好選民,推了「醫療糾紛處理及醫療事故補償法」(簡稱「醫糾法」),我們相信為其核心的強制調解的作法,等同頭痛醫腳,只會帶來催生糾紛、深化醫病對立之效果。 其實,回歸本質思考,這個影響社會安定至鉅、卻又莫衷一是的難題並非無解。我們非常市儈地認為,必須以「財源」之規劃作為核心,才不會治絲益棼。謹在此拋磚引玉,提出三個解決問題的思考方向(如下A, B, C三點),就教於各界。但在提出之前,必須先表明我們的五項認知基礎:…

June 4, Special and Indeed Controversial

Two days ago, news coverages in the Greater China region all focused on the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, in a cohesive and almost obnoxiously repetitive manner. Yet, all the way across the pacific ocean, major news…