Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

SEC Cracking Down ICOs

2018 - 11 - 13

In the past few months, the U.S. SEC has significantly expanded its crackdown on hundreds of ICO projects, putting these startups at risk. Recently, the SEC has subpoenaed several ICO startups that failed to sell tokens exclusively to accredited investors.

In response to the subpoenas, dozens of companies have agreed to refund investors and pay a fine. However, it seems that those who can simply walk away by paying up are the lucky ones as many others continue struggling to satisfy the rather unclear and inconsistent demands from the SEC.

Many ICOs were successfully launched in the past two years by structuring as a “utility token” or a SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens), despite SEC executives’ previous comments on how they think of most ICOS as securities. It is not until July this year when the SEC announced that the $150M ICO project DAO is a security offering, other ICOs started to realise that the SEC is not messing around any more.

Why is being seen as a security offering such a big deal? Because it is required by law that any U.S. company offering a security must register with the SEC, which is a tedious process. The other lawful way to do it is to qualify for an exemption, such as selling only to foreign investors, or accredited investors with more than $200,000 income in each of the past two years or a minimum net worth of $1M. And you guessed it, virtually all ICOs went for the exemption path, by providing a set of checkboxes as a method to exclude unqualified investors. However, the SEC wants more than that by spelling out plainly: “reviewing documentation, such as W-2s, tax returns, bank and brokerage statements, credit reports and the like.”

From the SEC’s standpoint, lack of clarity does not exist, and that the decades old security laws can perfectly apply to ICOs.

“Everybody’s holding their breath for the SEC to create some kind of coin rule, and they’re not going to,” says a securities attorney at one high-profile Silicon Valley firm. “They’re applying the same laws, the same statutes, the same rules, to stocks and bonds and everything else.”

Sources are saying that a crypto union led by Ripple is formed and D.C. lobbyists are hired to lobby Congress on the industry’s behalf. The outcome shall be very interesting.

Recommended article 

Glut in China's Housing Market

Murky Data Add to China’s Housing Headache Glut in China’s property market is worse than official data show, creating a drag on economic growth. …… China’s inventory of unsold homes is equal, on a square-foot basis,…

Privacy Shield - U.S., EU Struck Deal to Protect Data Privacy

The data privacy agreement signed by U.S and E.U has been announced invalid by the European Court of Justice because of the lack of protection. 華爾街日報報導了有關歐盟與美國間的「資料隱私協議」之相關新聞: U.S., EU Reach Deal on New Data-Transfer Framework U.S. makes…

PEWC Scandal

PEWC has been founded for over half a century, it belonged to the first phase to build conventional industry, and then started to diversify and become more international. 走過半個世紀的「太平洋電線電纜公司」,從以前屬於創建傳統產業基礎的第一階段,到開啟多角化與國際化的第二階段。太電為台灣地區最大的電線電纜製造廠之一,不但在泰國、新加坡、澳洲、大陸地區有廠房,多角化的發展,更使太電成為一個跨足線纜、光電、通訊、衛星電視、電子資訊及高速鐵路等事業的企業集團。 1994年太電公司當時之副總經理及財務長胡洪九,利用公司資金在香港、英屬維京群島等地設立公司,以太電公司為擔保透過海外公司發行公司債,外加使用轉投資、不當交易等方式將資金轉入這些海外公司,再將這些資金匯到146家海外公司洗錢。 胡洪九還利用海外交叉持股,用太電公司在香港的資金購買不動產,將其登記再另一家海外公司名下,其擅自處分太電公司資產並不當挪用,利用假定存單掩飾資金缺口,事後企圖解散海外公司以防減掉追查,前前後後共掏空太電公司約171億元,使公司陷入財務危機,被媒體形容為世紀經濟犯罪掏空案。 太電公司於民國54年即已上市,長久以來被視為成長性佳的績優股,股東人數眾多,受到掏空案影響,導致太電下市,投資人受害人數創下新紀錄,國安基金也慘賠17億,等於是全民埋單!