Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

SEC Cracking Down ICOs

2018 - 11 - 13

In the past few months, the U.S. SEC has significantly expanded its crackdown on hundreds of ICO projects, putting these startups at risk. Recently, the SEC has subpoenaed several ICO startups that failed to sell tokens exclusively to accredited investors.

In response to the subpoenas, dozens of companies have agreed to refund investors and pay a fine. However, it seems that those who can simply walk away by paying up are the lucky ones as many others continue struggling to satisfy the rather unclear and inconsistent demands from the SEC.

Many ICOs were successfully launched in the past two years by structuring as a “utility token” or a SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens), despite SEC executives’ previous comments on how they think of most ICOS as securities. It is not until July this year when the SEC announced that the $150M ICO project DAO is a security offering, other ICOs started to realise that the SEC is not messing around any more.

Why is being seen as a security offering such a big deal? Because it is required by law that any U.S. company offering a security must register with the SEC, which is a tedious process. The other lawful way to do it is to qualify for an exemption, such as selling only to foreign investors, or accredited investors with more than $200,000 income in each of the past two years or a minimum net worth of $1M. And you guessed it, virtually all ICOs went for the exemption path, by providing a set of checkboxes as a method to exclude unqualified investors. However, the SEC wants more than that by spelling out plainly: “reviewing documentation, such as W-2s, tax returns, bank and brokerage statements, credit reports and the like.”

From the SEC’s standpoint, lack of clarity does not exist, and that the decades old security laws can perfectly apply to ICOs.

“Everybody’s holding their breath for the SEC to create some kind of coin rule, and they’re not going to,” says a securities attorney at one high-profile Silicon Valley firm. “They’re applying the same laws, the same statutes, the same rules, to stocks and bonds and everything else.”

Sources are saying that a crypto union led by Ripple is formed and D.C. lobbyists are hired to lobby Congress on the industry’s behalf. The outcome shall be very interesting.

Recommended article 

The Compliance of a Product Launch - The Controversial Case of Uber

The nature of law is a powerful type of value judgments. The way we make laws has a lot to do with our history, culture, ethics, customs, race, and forms of government, etc. Continue reading

Internal Controls: Understaffed

Another problem in internal control practices is that they often exist to keep up the appearance. The department of internal control exists only for compliance’s sake. 實務上最常見的另一個問題就是內部控制制度流於形式,淪為一個僅僅為了符合法律規定而存在的編制。由於管理階層對於內部控制制度的不重視,造成公司不願花費成本聘請太多內部稽核人員,而使一個人員須負責超過其負荷量的業務,稽核品質可想而知。 在有分公司的情況下,一位總公司的稽核人員除了要負責數個業務單位之查核工作外,還要外加每個月出差至公司其他營業據點或應受查單位從事查核工作,從事相關工作的稽核人員根本不可能深入了解所轄查核業務的內外規以及實際運作的全貌,外加分公司人員由於自身業務忙碌、怕麻煩或其他自身利益之考量,往往不願意全力配合調查或是提供完整資料,而最後稽核人員迫於時限壓力,還是得交出稽核報告以及查核明細表,在這種工作底稿都未能完整取得之前提條件下,內部稽核的高調唱得再響,實際上也歸於枉然。 1. 請參行政院勞工委員會,職業類別薪資調查報告,民國95年6月。 ↩

Who's Going to Buy Netflix?

This is old news, but there are still pundits believe that Amazon is going to buy Netflix. Continue reading