Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

SEC Cracking Down ICOs

2018 - 11 - 13

In the past few months, the U.S. SEC has significantly expanded its crackdown on hundreds of ICO projects, putting these startups at risk. Recently, the SEC has subpoenaed several ICO startups that failed to sell tokens exclusively to accredited investors.

In response to the subpoenas, dozens of companies have agreed to refund investors and pay a fine. However, it seems that those who can simply walk away by paying up are the lucky ones as many others continue struggling to satisfy the rather unclear and inconsistent demands from the SEC.

Many ICOs were successfully launched in the past two years by structuring as a “utility token” or a SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens), despite SEC executives’ previous comments on how they think of most ICOS as securities. It is not until July this year when the SEC announced that the $150M ICO project DAO is a security offering, other ICOs started to realise that the SEC is not messing around any more.

Why is being seen as a security offering such a big deal? Because it is required by law that any U.S. company offering a security must register with the SEC, which is a tedious process. The other lawful way to do it is to qualify for an exemption, such as selling only to foreign investors, or accredited investors with more than $200,000 income in each of the past two years or a minimum net worth of $1M. And you guessed it, virtually all ICOs went for the exemption path, by providing a set of checkboxes as a method to exclude unqualified investors. However, the SEC wants more than that by spelling out plainly: “reviewing documentation, such as W-2s, tax returns, bank and brokerage statements, credit reports and the like.”

From the SEC’s standpoint, lack of clarity does not exist, and that the decades old security laws can perfectly apply to ICOs.

“Everybody’s holding their breath for the SEC to create some kind of coin rule, and they’re not going to,” says a securities attorney at one high-profile Silicon Valley firm. “They’re applying the same laws, the same statutes, the same rules, to stocks and bonds and everything else.”

Sources are saying that a crypto union led by Ripple is formed and D.C. lobbyists are hired to lobby Congress on the industry’s behalf. The outcome shall be very interesting.

Recommended article 

Three Objectives of Internal Controls

Each company has own objectives to accomplish. Common ones probably are the annual sales targets, the number of new businesses to expand, or something like that. 每一家企業都會有自己希望能夠達成的目標,最常聽聞的可能是希望今年的營業額達到多少、預計擴張幾家營業據點之類的。當然,公司有大有小,經營的項目也千奇百怪,各公司企業欲達到的目標自然也是推陳出新的了。 我們前面也提過了,內部控制制度就像是人穿的鞋子,不可能剛好符合每個人的腳,所以每雙鞋子會因應不同的需求來設計其功能及造型,有適合運動的、符合正式場合要求的、可以爬山的等等,但是不同功能的鞋子仍然具有鞋子的基本、共通的目標-保護你的腳。 不同公司企業間當然也有共通的目標了,像是賺錢、繼續生存就是每家企業都會有的目標。內部控制制度就是針對一些企業間共通的目標,來提供經營者控制企業活動的過程及方法。 COSO委員會所提出的內部控制三大目標,分別是營運的效果與效率、財務文件的正確性以及法令規範的遵循,以下這三大目標就是每一家企業都需要追求的目標。 (一)營運的效果與效率 當我們談到企業營運的「效果」,其實就是在談這家企業東西賣不賣的出去、賺不賺的到錢,營利是企業存在的最原始、最本質的目的了,縱然賺錢不是企業存在的唯一目的,也不能否認它的重要性。營運的效率則是指企業所掌握的資源(人力、時間、金錢、設備)是否被有效的利用。 舉例來說,今天有A、B兩家企業,當年淨獲利都是一億新台幣,我們會認為這兩家企業的營運是有效果的;而談到營運效率的時候我們可能會去觀察A、B的資本額以及員工人數多寡,發現A為資本額三千萬,30人的小型公司、B則是擁有五十億資本員工近千人的大企業,B相較於A就顯的相當的沒有效率。    由此可見,企業光是賺錢還不夠,企業還必需學習如何妥善的運用其所擁有的資源來提高利潤,企業的經營要效果與效率並重,這是內部控制制度非常關心的一個部份。 (二)財務文件的正確性…

Apple to Buy HBO? Content is Not King!

Is content really “king”?  Younger audience tends to watch less TV these days. They binge watch YouTube, 17 , and Games, things didn’t exist before. 內容真的是「王」嗎?我們來看天下大勢。 愈年輕的世代,看傳統電視節目的時間愈少,他們關注的目光被拉往各式各樣從前根本不存在的 YouTube, 17, 手遊等等之內容。 然而,HBO Now 遲至 2014 年底才成立,而它在傳統電視中的收視占比,遠低於它在年輕人用得最多的手機、平板、筆電中之占比,毫無疑問。那麼,掌控極大量優質內容獨領風騷數十年的 HBO,真心還會覺得自家的內容是王嗎? 你的內容「非看不可」嗎?…

Healthcare vs. Drug Price

Media in Taiwan has been reporting that drug price investigations result in low drug prices and pharmaceutical companies threaten to leave Taiwan. Continue reading