Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

SEC Cracking Down ICOs

2018 - 11 - 13

In the past few months, the U.S. SEC has significantly expanded its crackdown on hundreds of ICO projects, putting these startups at risk. Recently, the SEC has subpoenaed several ICO startups that failed to sell tokens exclusively to accredited investors.

In response to the subpoenas, dozens of companies have agreed to refund investors and pay a fine. However, it seems that those who can simply walk away by paying up are the lucky ones as many others continue struggling to satisfy the rather unclear and inconsistent demands from the SEC.

Many ICOs were successfully launched in the past two years by structuring as a “utility token” or a SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens), despite SEC executives’ previous comments on how they think of most ICOS as securities. It is not until July this year when the SEC announced that the $150M ICO project DAO is a security offering, other ICOs started to realise that the SEC is not messing around any more.

Why is being seen as a security offering such a big deal? Because it is required by law that any U.S. company offering a security must register with the SEC, which is a tedious process. The other lawful way to do it is to qualify for an exemption, such as selling only to foreign investors, or accredited investors with more than $200,000 income in each of the past two years or a minimum net worth of $1M. And you guessed it, virtually all ICOs went for the exemption path, by providing a set of checkboxes as a method to exclude unqualified investors. However, the SEC wants more than that by spelling out plainly: “reviewing documentation, such as W-2s, tax returns, bank and brokerage statements, credit reports and the like.”

From the SEC’s standpoint, lack of clarity does not exist, and that the decades old security laws can perfectly apply to ICOs.

“Everybody’s holding their breath for the SEC to create some kind of coin rule, and they’re not going to,” says a securities attorney at one high-profile Silicon Valley firm. “They’re applying the same laws, the same statutes, the same rules, to stocks and bonds and everything else.”

Sources are saying that a crypto union led by Ripple is formed and D.C. lobbyists are hired to lobby Congress on the industry’s behalf. The outcome shall be very interesting.

Recommended article 

Glut of Chinese Goods Causes Global Deflation

Glut of Chinese Goods Pinches Global Economy     Plants in China keep producing as growth falls, fueling deflationary pressure world-wide 「DONGYING, China— Liu Zijun built a thriving tire-manufacturing business when China’s economy was roaring ahead. But when…

Forget the 1992 Consensus, One-China Policy Does No Harm

There was no 1992 consensus. Even if there had been one, it would have been an under-the-table consensus between KMT and Chinese Communist Party ,which has nothing to do with the citizens in Taiwan. This has…

How American Corporations Practice Internal Controls

To encourage companies to adopt pratical compliance policy, U.S government revised the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in 1991. The revision included the sentencing guidelines for organised crime. 美國為敦促公司採取具體的法令遵循規範,以降低其違法之風險,於1991年修訂了「聯邦裁罰綱領」,加入組織犯罪部份之裁罰準則。其並未強制公司必須實施何種法令遵循計畫,而是以提供法定之經濟上誘因,如罰鍰額之降低或加重、董事責任之免除等,使公司願意自行投入資源設計並執行法令遵循計畫。縱然企業不慎違法,只要其有設計並且有效執行法令遵循計畫,就可以得得減輕處罰之優惠。 公司所設計執行的法令遵循計畫必須要具備某些條件,方能被視為有效,基本上必須採取以下7個步驟: 標準程序之建立:該組織必須建立一套法令遵循之標準及程序,使員工與其他代理人能夠據以合理降低觸犯法令之可能性。 遵循主管之指派:公司必須指派特定之高級主管,授予其蓋闊之權限,以監督企業是否有確實遵循上述法令遵循之標準及程序 權責主管背景查核:各該組織必須採取妥適之注意,不得對該組織有犯法傾向之員工授予重大裁量權。 全體員工需知悉:各該組織須已採行步驟,將其法令遵循之標準及程序有效的通知全體員工及其他代理人,例如要求參予訓練計畫,將所要求之事項從實際之角度加以解釋並做成公告散布。 監控稽核須有效:各組織必須已採取合理之步驟以達成對其所設定標準之遵循。例如:採用在合理範圍內能夠肫查其員工及其代理人觸犯刑事犯罪行為之監控稽核系統,或設置並公佈一套查報系統,使喁供及其他代理人能將組織內他人觸犯刑事責任之回報與組織,而無庸畏懼將招致報復。 懲戒機制須適當:該組織之法令遵循標準必須已經平等一致的透過適當懲戒機制強制執行。該機制包括對於職務上應查報違法狀況而未查報之員工進行懲戒。對於職務上應就該違法情況負責之員工所為之適當懲戒亦屬強制施行之必要部份。所謂適當之懲戒應依個案判定。 違法情況之處理預防:在某種違法情況被查知後,該組織必須已採取一切合理之步驟以妥適面對該種情況,並防止將來類似情形再發生。其所採取之一切合理步驟,包括對其法令遵循計畫之所有必要之修改,以預防並偵知違法情況。 在罰金的計算方面,首先法院會以弊案發生後受害人之金錢損失、被告的金錢所得與根據分析「違法層級表」所得出之罰金等幾個因素來決定一個基本的罰金數額,罰金數額最低是5千美金最高則是7千2百萬美金。除此之外,聯邦裁罰綱領會採用一個增加或是減少罰金數額之機制,稱為「苛責分數」(Culpability…