Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Selling Mobile Ads - Facebook Does it Better Than Publishers

2015 - 05 - 15

With Facebook’s Instant Articles, Publishers May Find 70 Cents Is Better Than a Dollar

Publishers are still digesting the details of Facebook’s new “Instant Articles” initiative, which in the first 24 hours has set off reactions ranging from panic to confusion to envy across the online news landscape.

There are many questions for media executives to consider about the program, which allows whole articles and videos to be published to the social media site’s mobile app. One major consideration is whether Facebook can help publishers generate revenue from their mobile audiences more successfully than they can themselves.

The answer? Quite possibly, because Facebook has figured out what other online ad sellers haven’t: how to effectively target and track mobile ads.

As first reported by the Wall Street Journal, participating publishers will keep 100% of the revenue generated from advertising placed alongside Instant Articles, provided they sell and serve the ads themselves. They get a 70% cut if Facebook sells the ads through its Audience Network product.

http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/05/14/with-facebooks-instant-articles-publishers-may-find-70-cents-is-better-than-a-dollar/

所以,報社透過FB所銷售的廣告拿回70%的分潤之總合,會遠勝過自己在FB的”Instant Articles”裡所賣的廣告營收(雖然自售的廣告收入100%歸報社自己)。

儘管不假思索也知道是這樣,但這篇WSJ的文章提供了進一步說明。

簡單歸納起來原因有二:

(1) 原本的吃飯領域:”Facebook will collect around 33% of all mobile display ad spending in the U.S. this year.”

(2) 原生的吃飯傢伙:藉著”Like 按讚”,使用者的喜好FB當然比報社懂;另外,FB的跨裝置廣告效果追蹤分析,自然遠比cookies更有效

Recommended article 

Document Mangement is the Core of Internal Control System

Information and communication is the core among 5 factors of internal controls, and document management is the most important practice of information and communication. 「文件管理」是內部控制制度的核心觀念 資訊與溝通是內部控制五大要素中的核心要素,而「文件管理」則是資訊與溝通中最為重要之實踐。 人類的知識、常識或是各種人類所思、所知的內容都必須藉由特定的媒介才能將其呈現出來而讓他人得以感知、聽聞進而達到溝通之功能,而這些承載人類所思、所知內容的媒介形式,我們即稱之為資訊。 在企業當中的資訊會有哪些媒介形式?傳統紙本資料如契約、訂單、對帳單、往來書信、財務報表….等;數位資料如電子郵件、電子檔案等,這些媒介都是企業所擁有的資訊。 而不論是傳統紙本或是數位檔案,都是本書所謂的「文件管理」所欲涵蓋的「文件」範疇,換句話說,我們可以認為,不管大小、內外、重要與否的所有資訊都是以「文件」的形式存在於企業內部。掌握文件,就掌握了企業內部的所有資訊。 此外,除非有人會「心電感應」或是「讀心術」之類的技巧,否則企業當中仍需藉由「溝通」的過程來達成各種營運目標,而「溝通」主要就是以「文件」的傳遞為主,例如管理階層已發電子郵件之方式下達公司新政策、業務部門接到訂單後傳真給工廠生產線、內部稽核人員撰寫稽核報告呈交董事會等。 經由這個溝通的過程,資訊本身才能發揮其功能,這正是之所以資訊與溝通這麼密不可分的緣故。缺乏資訊,溝通猶如失根蘭花;缺乏溝通,資訊毫無用武之地! 經由上述說法,本書提出前所未有的創新觀點:既然資訊與溝通是貫穿內部控制的要素,資訊與溝通的良窳對企業內控制度影響深遠,而資訊與溝通在企業中的實踐則是以企業內的「文件」為主,所以,「文件管理」的成功與否便成為企業內部控制制度決定性的因素、核心中的核心!

hTC and India

hTC has partnered with India-based phone distributor Global Devices Network to initiate its production plan in India. 「……宏達電將攜手印度手機經銷商 Global Devices Network 啟動印度製造計畫,然而,不只宏達電,三星、小米、微軟等廠商都將眼光看向印度智慧手機市場,宏達電能藉此起死回生,又或只是換在另一紅海沉浮還未可知。」 http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/36694 我就講能講的部分好了。 1. 不論量衝上多少支,hTC在高度競爭的市場都賣不出可以看的毛利,接下來我們已見即將在印度發生的流血惡戰更將逼它敗走切腹。在減除直接成本、折舊攤提、行銷費用、以及其他overhead後,依我粗估,倘若真的進軍那兒的話,前幾年平均連5毛台幣的稅後都貢獻不出來,在財報數字上根本幫不了忙。您就別問前幾年之後了,那時hTC在餅圖上還看不看得到位子都不知道。 2. 這家公司向來的問題,在於獲致初步成功後所養成的從上到下的自大、驕氣、與目中無人;這一點到目前依舊沒變,要怎麼好起來?股價750元時,我就已對幾位有公信力的朋友公開講它將掉到150元,事後也證明在那個價位上下停留最久。 3. 瞎猜ASUS要併購它的人根本完全不懂併購的核心思考與技術;hTC想要活下去再取得市場的信任,只能靠自己,作打掉重練的調整,以內容帶硬體、從應用帶硬體,都是可以揣摩的方向。畢竟,從全球的角度,當前舉目所及,沒半個人會對它出手。 我從多年前就確認宏達電已走向墮落,也持續痛責它的幾位領導人不適任,在我部落格裡罵得更凶;但這一切都純粹是基於客觀的評估。在主觀上,我仍誠心祈願這個台灣品牌更好。

Pardon Power isn't All That Powerful

The United States Constitution grants the POTUS the pardon power for federal crimes and state offences recognizable under state criminal law. “But issuing pardons to his own friends, associates and relatives could be a perilous path for…