Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Disney Jumping into the Global OTT War

2018 - 07 - 25

Disney will be ending its distribution deal with Netflix and starting a brand new OTT service of its own. With the release of this major news, Disney has just become the biggest cord-cutter Hollywood has ever seen.

Being the biggest entertainment company for years, Disney undoubtedly has a huge library of valuable content in forms of movies, tv shows and more. In this sense, launching an OTT service of its own is nothing to be surprised about, rather, cord-cutters can expect to see less Disney content (if at all) on any other OTT platforms.

In addition to the original film and tv show streaming platform, Disney is also launching a sports streaming service called ESPN Plus. The sports service will exist as an add-on within the ESPN app. This move will drastically differentiate Disney’s streaming service from other OTT platforms, as sports content is usually non existent in OTT.

“This acquisition and the launch of our direct-to-consumer services mark an entirely new growth strategy for the company, one that takes advantage of the incredible opportunity that changing technology provides us to leverage the strength of our great brands,” Disney CEO Bob Iger said in a statement accompanying the announcements.

Although the loss of Disney content will be a major disappointment for Netflix subscribers, Netflix continues to spend more money making its own shows, and noteworthily good shows. In preparation to the potential loss of Marvel’s shows, Netflix also acquired Millarworld, which published critically acclaimed comics like Wanted, Kick-Ass, and Kingsman. That being said, it is obvious that Netflix is not giving up the title of OTT king anytime soon.

Sources:

  1. Disney Unveils New Streaming Services, to End Netflix Deal – WSJ
  2. Disney will dump its exclusive Netflix deal in 2019, and launch its own streaming service – Business Insider

Recommended article 

Apple Leaving No Quarters for Suppliers

Even for a company as rick like Apple, cutting price and order volume is a must, leaving no quarters for its suppliers. Continue reading

Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines are U.S regulations related to internal controls. Sarbanes-Oxley Act is another commonly heard law. 在美國與內部控制比較相關的法規一個是於1991年生效的聯邦裁法綱領(Federal Sentencing Guidelines)1,另一個則是大家可能比較常聽到的,於2002年所制定之沙賓法案(Sarbanes-Oxley Act)。前者是提供法官一個科刑的客觀標準,同時提供企業遵循法令之誘因;後者則是提出許多與公司治理方面相關的改革制度,其中當然有與內部控制制度息息相關之制度,以下將簡單介紹此兩種法規。 參考資料: 1. 聯邦裁罰綱領(Federal Sentencing Guidelines)是由美國裁罰委員會於1987年5月提出之法案,並於同年11月經過國會同意後成為正式之法律。其目的是希望能夠提供法官一個科刑之客觀標準,根據個人犯罪行為之嚴重性及犯罪歷史而決定其裁罰範圍,才不會發生兩個人違反同樣的法律,由不同的法官來審理,一個法官給予行為人緩刑,另一個法官卻科最高刑度之情形。其後於1991年5月,裁罰委員會另外提出針對組織犯罪行為之裁罰綱領(Organizational Guidelines),經國會同意後成為聯邦裁罰綱領的第8章。本書所討論之範圍即是第8章關於組織犯罪之部分。

Forget the 1992 Consensus, One-China Policy Does No Harm

There was no 1992 consensus. Even if there had been one, it would have been an under-the-table consensus between KMT and Chinese Communist Party ,which has nothing to do with the citizens in Taiwan. This has…