Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

SEC Shows You What an ICO Fraud Look Like

2018 - 07 - 24

According to ICO consulting firm Satis Group’s report, near 80% ICO projects can be seen as fraudulent.

ICO is the hottest way for blockchain startups to raise funds. Companies can issue a token sale, which the investors would purchase the tokens using digital assets like bitcoin or ether. Launching an ICO project does not need to go through the same regulatory process like an IPO. Therefore, scams related to cryptocurrency are common, and given that the ICO trend is still booming, new types of crypto/ICO scams can be expected.

The SEC is the official agency in the U.S. that regulates ICO. Instead of releasing a boring 10-page reports on ICO scamming alerts, the SEC came up with a rather creative way to educate investors on fraudulent ICO – by launching its own (fake) ICO.

The SEC’s HoweyCoin “utilize the latest crypto-technology to allow travelers to purchase all segments without these limitations, allowing HoweyCoin users to buy, sell, and trade in a frictionless environment – where they use HoweyCoins to purchase travel OR as a government-backed, freely tradable investment – or both!” Sounds cool right? On HoweyCoin’s website, the ICO issuer tells us that it is fully approved by the SEC, with its own whitepaper and endorsements from industry/social leaders. Moreover, investors who invest in HoweyCoin will be “guaranteed” a 1-2 percent returns and enjoys high annual growth, etc. It is all too good to be true!

Generally, a fraudulent ICO project contains a whitepaper filled with complex yet vague languages, and lots of promises. The team that runs the project may look highly promising, with each of them claiming to be industry leaders (but you can’t find anything on them via the internet). Fortunately, investors who fell into the howeycoin scam will be redirected to SEC’s educational site. However, other ICO scams will be vicious and Investors should apply risk-based judgements and invest carefully.

Sources:

  1. SATIS Group Report: ‘78% of ICOs are Scams’
  2. HoweyCoins
  3. The SEC Just Launched a Fake ICO Website to Educate Investors

Recommended article 

Is ICO Token a Security?

The issuance of an ICO has been the hottest method for blockchain startups to get funds in the past two years. So hot that even non-blockchain startups and big public companies are diving into the trend.…

Internal Control Systems : Born With Flaws (Part 2)

Internal Control Systems are usually designed by accountants or underwriters according to company practices in similar fields and internal controls regulations. 內控機制的先天缺陷-制訂內控制度未能全面涵蓋重要營運事項 內部控制制度通常是由會計師或承銷商為公司所設計,但他們不是憑空產生,而是參照其他相類似產業的公司與相關法令的內部控制制度來設計的,然而其所引用、參考的母版對原來的公司而言都可能已經有不完備的現象了,更別提以削足適履、東打補釘、西改褲長的方式來為新的委託人規劃內控了,產生疏漏是命中注定的事情。    除了上述會計師、承銷商設計內控的問題之外,公司內負責執行內部控制作業的部門通常是內部稽核單位,但是內部稽核人員是否充分了解其他部門的作業習慣以及可能產生弊端之處呢?實務操作上十分困難。因為真正了解全盤情況的高階主管必須負責處理公司內比「撰寫內部控制制度」更迫切的問題如拓展業績、尋找有利之融資管道、規劃新的產品線及通路佈局、美化財報數字等,根本不可能將此種稀有人力資源花費在陪同會計師處理內部控制制度之問題上。 肇因於上述的兩個理由,企業的內部控制制度常常不符其需求。照道理來說,內部控制制度應該包含公司所有營運活動,而公司為他人背書保證、負債承諾、將公司資金貸予他人等處分公司資產之重要事項卻常未訂定相關程序,或是未訂有相關人員違反時的罰則。 如果對於公司本身背書保證、負債承諾、將公司資金貸予他人之行為不予控管,那麼就等於敞開不肖人士掏空公司的大門。管理階層可以輕易的動用公司資金來從事有利於其自身的活動,比如說未經董事會審核而將錢貸與或投資另一家管理階層人士掌控的公司、管理階層自己向銀行貸款而以公司資產作保,之後卻不償還債款致公司資產被變賣,這些行為都是實務上常見的現象,沒有一個有效全面的內控制度,公司資產安全堪慮! 印鑑管理也是某些公司會出現的問題,有些公司雖然訂有印鑑領用之程序,卻忽略印鑑有無歸還以及定期盤點印鑑,使印鑑易被盜用。無獨有偶,國票案及理律案都恰好在印鑑管理上有極大缺失,理律案因為「信任」兩個字而授權劉偉杰全權處理客戶股票事宜因而將相關印鑑統一由其保管;國票則是將印鑑隨意放置在員工辦公桌上,對於每個員工所持有的印鑑缺乏有效的管理機制,隨後才會引發一連串風波。

Can Alibaba Cloud Duplicate Their Chinese-Market Success in U.S?

Alibaba is selling its American subsidiary 11 Main to American E-commerce platform OpenSky, which means Alibaba has failed in U.S market. 阿里攻美國電商 鎩羽而歸 「阿里巴巴集團將出售美國子公司11 Main(https://11main.com/)給美國電商OpenSky,這意味著阿里巴巴進軍美國電商市場鎩羽而歸,在這筆換股交易中,阿里巴巴將獲得OpenSky的37.6%股份,交易金額並未透露。」 http://ppt.cc/UDjax 「阿里雲」有一天會變得像AWS一樣,被全球認同? 真能成功複製在中國的「成功經驗」? 這篇文章已證明BABA去國外連電商的成功經驗都複製不出來;公有雲? 誰會把自家的系統放到這個以網路長城揚威全球的中國共產黨所圈養的公有雲上? Aliyun在出了網路長城之後,唯一能攻的市場就是以近乎免費的方式吸引創業者在開發階段利用;等開發完成進入商轉時,再看看有沒有機會把人家給留著(比方說,BABA投資他們)。但是,留下來的,腦袋的洞基本上也跟馬雲他們一樣大,這樣的創業者會不會成功? 如果是中國企業到外國落地,除了藏錢之外,同時也得趕緊設法讓自己全家都辦好外國護照;一切透過IT上的交易,當然要躲老共躲得愈遠愈好,誰會想用阿里雲? 〔Aliyun的國外客戶數 = 無腦公有雲用戶 +…