Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Is ICO Token a Security?

2018 - 07 - 24

The issuance of an ICO has been the hottest method for blockchain startups to get funds in the past two years. So hot that even non-blockchain startups and big public companies are diving into the trend. From the PwC and Crypto Valley Association’s report, statistics show that more money has been raised within the first 5 months of 2018 than in all pre-2018 years combined. However, not all ICO resulted in success. In fact, studies from Boston University show that more than half of the ICO projects worldwide are dead within 4 months, many due to compliance issues, especially when it comes to whether the token is a security or not.

ICO tokens can be generally categorized into two categories: utility/security. The SEC has announced that neither Bitcoin (BTC) nor Etherum (ETH) are “securities”, given their decentralised nature and utility values. However, to this date, the SEC has not approved any other ICO to be solely a utility token.

“A token, a digital asset, where I give you my money and you go off and make a venture, and in return for giving you my money I say ‘you can get a return’ that is a security and we regulate that,” Clayton said. “We regulate the offering of that security and regulate the trading of that security.” – Jay Clayton, SEC

To determine whether a token is a security or not, the SEC applies the “Howey Test”, a test derived from the 1946 SEC v. Howey Co. case.

Although the Taiwanese government has yet to provide any regulatory guidance when it comes to ICO, companies wishing to launch an ICO project should consult with legal experts and make sure all the compliance are in place.

Sources:

  1. SEC v. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946)
  2. SEC chief says agency won’t change securities laws to cater to cryptocurrencies
  3. A strategic perspective
  4. Study Finds that Over Half of ICOs Die in First Four Months

 

Recommended article 

Internal Controls Can't Close Loopholes?

The origin of the problem is the the blank commercial papers. Buying and selling the commercial papers is the main business of the company, which can not operate without blank commercial papers. 妥善保管空白商業本票還有主管的印鑑,建立有效的核對方式 這其實是問題發生的最源頭,公司主要的業務就是票券的買賣,沒有空白的票生意就做不成了,那空白的商業本票就是公司跟他人交易當中最常會使用到的物品了,公司本來就應該好好保管,不然就容易使不肖之徒心存僥倖。國票公司針對空白本票的存放太過隨便,使楊瑞仁想拿多少就拿多少。另外對於公司裡面空白本票的存放數量也沒有紀錄,減少的數量跟當天成立契約的數量是否相符也沒有人在關心,雙重的內控失靈使楊瑞仁放心的進行犯罪計畫。 如果能夠將每天國票公司與客戶成立的各種券買賣契約建檔管理,那麼用成立票券買賣契約的數量與空白本票使用的數量來互相對照,就可以輕鬆了解剩下多少空白本票,而在有短少的情況下就可以及時發現了。 另一個源頭就是印鑑的保管,有的公司可能未了方便而將印鑑隨手放在辦公桌上,使需要的人可以自行取用,同時卻也增加了不該用的人來使用它的風險,可行的辦法是重要印鑑由專人保管,比如說公司內部的稽核單位,每一次經過用印的文件都予以建檔管理,方便稽核人員從事稽核之工作,比如可以將公司買賣商業本票之契約與該本票放再同一個資料夾當中方便核對,有票卻沒有契約那就一定有問題。…

Nice-to-have vs. Must-have

How many of us are music fanatics, consider it life necessity and have to listen to something everyday? Continue reading

Internal Data not Accessible and Bad Executions

According to the “Code of Internal Controls System Establishment for Public Traded Companies”: Public traded companies should review the effectiveness of its internal controls system annually. 根據「公開發行公司建立內部控制制度處理準則」之規定1,公開發行公司應該每年自行檢查內部控制制度執行的有效性,內容必須涵蓋所有的內部控制制度,同時公司本身要訂出一套內部控制制度自行檢查作業之程序與方法,將檢查結果製作成內部控制聲明書之後呈報主管機關備查。 根據實證研究報告所蒐集之問卷指出2,在這個「內控自評」之過程當中,內部稽核單位會遇到的困難除了前述所提及的人力不足、資源有限之外,還會出現公司內部機密資料不易取得、資訊運用欠缺的問題。 讀者或許會納悶,公司內部的稽核部門,或是其他部門如業務、行銷部門既然都同屬一家公司,理應容易取得其他部門的資料才是,又為何會有此種所謂「內部機密資料不易取得」而無法稽核的情況呢? 事實上,不難想像在一家頗有規模的公開發行公司當中,各個部門各司其職,而且在資料的管理上也是分由各種不同部門負責,而通常內部稽核部門因其職責所在,容易被其他部門視為找麻煩的部門,如果內部稽核部門不受到管理階級如總經理、董事長的大力支持的話,其他部門當然不會願意提供稽核部門真正所需要的資料,畢竟,沒有人會願意自接瘡疤的。 如果沒有相關的業務資料及文件,也會造成內部稽核人員的工作內容無法受到監督,內部稽核單位的工作是監督、查核各單位的業務,而內部稽核人員本身也必須受到董事會的的監督3,但是如果內部稽核人員所繳交的稽核報告當中都沒有各業務單位的原始資料、證據,董事會根本無法監督其工作內容,內部稽核單位有沒有認真執行任務不得而知。 如此一來,得不到應有的資料根本無法確實稽核相關業務,也無法再被董事會監督4,內部稽核報告內未附工作底稿及相關資料是一個實務上常見的缺失,必須受到企業經營者的重視。 1. 請參「公開發行公司建立內部控制制度處理準則」第22 條。 2.…