Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

June 4, Special and Indeed Controversial

2018 - 06 - 06

Two days ago, news coverages in the Greater China region all focused on the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, in a cohesive and almost obnoxiously repetitive manner. Yet, all the way across the pacific ocean, major news like the WP, WSJ, and NYT, all covered a shocking Supreme Court decision, of which ruled for a Colorado baker who refused to make wedding cake for a gay couple based on his Christian belief.

“Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s 7-to-2 decision focused on what he described as religious bias on the part of Colorado Civil Rights Commission members who ruled against baker Jack Phillips, who owns Masterpiece Cakeshop.”

The Supreme Court made a landmark decision on the Obergefell v. Hodges case, which requires all 50 states of the U.S to perform and recognize same-sex marriages. However, with the Colorado baker’s case, it is interesting to see that religion beliefs, as protected by the First Amendment, trumps the recognition of same-sex marriage. The importance of this decision and the foreseeable waves of protests or disputes following this decision shall not taken lightly. Yet, not much was mentioned in the Chinese news, which we find very troublesome.

Source: Supreme Court Ruling Ducks Conflict Between Religious, Gay Rights – WP

 

Recommended article 

Taiwan's National Health Insurance Is Not That Bad

There are indeed problems with our health insurance, problems that affects healthcare quality and equality among all classes in our society. 無助的美國健康保險系統 「……美國健康保險制度五花八門,基本上都是民營的,政府辦理的只有窮人保險(Medicaid),政府辦理的保險很多醫生不參加,因為給付額度很低,而民間的健康保險制度非常複雜,同一家公司有HMO(管理式)、PPO(直接或自由式)等不同計畫……隨著經濟不景氣,越來越多人沒有健康保險,就會造成一個很大的醫療風暴,很多醫院關門,影響急難救助……。」 http://ppt.cc/2ZB5 健保的問題大,我瞭解。但是,大到影響我們社會裡各階級之就醫與保健權益、醫藥界等產業鏈的財富分配與人才養成,只靠著訴諸情緒而不探究問題本源的謾罵,只讓人覺得可惜。甚至有些人對於學名藥的講法,像極了為原廠藥在煽動民眾對政府施壓,對於體系性地解決問題毫無助益,可嘆。 這篇用生活化的口語說明美國的醫療保險制度,值得朋友們參考。 文章裡缺的,是處方藥有關的問題(總之,在美國拿到處方箋後,病人到藥局買藥時需自付的co-payment多半很高)。 凡讀過相關議題報導的都知道,美國的醫療(暨相關私人保險)制度與各種收費模式,即便對中產階級而言,都算得上是一大負擔,失業期間就更別提了,就醫的基本人權,僅不過是窮人的口號。此外,更有數千萬美國人,長年因為工作關係(例如:臨時性打工、或其雇主因財務考量而未提供等之情形。),根本連醫療保險都沒有,一旦生病,除非口袋有錢或四處告貸,否則只能勉強忍病不就醫。 反觀這些情況若發生在台灣呢? 制度要改善,沒有人會反對。請先衡平審視自己,才不會淪為痴人妄語。

Lack of Internal Controls Mechanism : Faulty Business Operations

What problem would arise if we do not implement proper internal controls mechanism? The mechanism itself aims to assist business owners to have a full and appropriate control over their company. 談完了內部控制的三大目標、五大要素,我們要來看看如果沒有把內部控制機制做好,到底會遇到什麼樣子的難題呢?內部控制制度本身是希望能幫助企業主對於其企業的營運有良好、全面的掌控,並且有利期監督,並且改良各種制度,所以一旦內部控制制度出了問題或是根本沒有控制制度,基本上各種難題都會應運而生,就像成語所說的「禍不單行」啦。基本上各家企業都會有一定的營運流程,那就是內部控制的一種,當然好壞或是完整與否就不一定了。 在這裡本書想要根據內部控制的三大目標來對讀者們說明,如果企業內部沒有一套好的內部控制,會產生什麼樣子的災難。 內部控制三大目標的第一個目標既然是營運的效果與效率,反面來看,如果企業沒有做好內部控制,企業的營運就會無法達到其效果與效率。那為什麼會因此沒有效果與效率呢?我們用最簡單的舉例方式來告訴大家。 A製造商的業務部門拿到了客戶的訂單,然後交給生產部門來報價給客戶好簽訂契約,但是因為內部溝通上的疏忽,造成生產部門根本不知道有訂單進來而未即時報價,最後因此喪失了這筆交易。這一筆交易可能是數百萬,或者是數千萬的訂單,對於A企業的營運影響至鉅。 讓我們來看看另一個例子,B企業的生產部門收到客戶的桌上型電腦訂單之後就趕緊報價,而且也順利的把客戶所要的產品生產出來了,事後卻發現做出來的電腦主機板與客戶所要求型號不相同,回頭調查時才發現原來是在設計圖的傳遞時發生了錯誤,搞混了各個客戶所提供的設計圖,B公司不但白白生產了一倉庫的電腦,可能還要吃上違約的官司呢!…

June 4, Special and Indeed Controversial

Two days ago, news coverages in the Greater China region all focused on the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, in a cohesive and almost obnoxiously repetitive manner. Yet, all the way across the pacific ocean, major news…