Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

June 4, Special and Indeed Controversial

2018 - 06 - 06

Two days ago, news coverages in the Greater China region all focused on the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, in a cohesive and almost obnoxiously repetitive manner. Yet, all the way across the pacific ocean, major news like the WP, WSJ, and NYT, all covered a shocking Supreme Court decision, of which ruled for a Colorado baker who refused to make wedding cake for a gay couple based on his Christian belief.

“Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s 7-to-2 decision focused on what he described as religious bias on the part of Colorado Civil Rights Commission members who ruled against baker Jack Phillips, who owns Masterpiece Cakeshop.”

The Supreme Court made a landmark decision on the Obergefell v. Hodges case, which requires all 50 states of the U.S to perform and recognize same-sex marriages. However, with the Colorado baker’s case, it is interesting to see that religion beliefs, as protected by the First Amendment, trumps the recognition of same-sex marriage. The importance of this decision and the foreseeable waves of protests or disputes following this decision shall not taken lightly. Yet, not much was mentioned in the Chinese news, which we find very troublesome.

Source: Supreme Court Ruling Ducks Conflict Between Religious, Gay Rights – WP

 

Recommended article 

Forget the 1992 Consensus, One-China Policy Does No Harm

There was no 1992 consensus. Even if there had been one, it would have been an under-the-table consensus between KMT and Chinese Communist Party ,which has nothing to do with the citizens in Taiwan. This has…

Thoughts on Third-Party Payment: It's a Fad

We have been through this topic in 2013. Third-party payment hasn’t been an “issue” in Taiwan. There is no problem to solve. 遊戲業攻支付 Q4激戰 「……目前樂點行動支付除將介接橘子集團旗下事業體,在全家、玉山、台灣大車隊、微程式等策略合作布局下,也將大幅拓展樂點行動支付應用場景,未來服務版圖將涵蓋遊戲、電商、P2P、娛樂、餐飲、交通、消費等線上至線下領域… 劉柏園表示,現階段將由自動找零的小額支付據點開始切入民生應用,讓消費者在販賣機、自助洗衣機、置物櫃、停車場等據點,能夠享受便利的行動支付服務,未來第三方支付也將成為集團營收主力……。」http://udn.com/news/story/7254/1218056 我早在2013年就講過了(http://goo.gl/DqJmEH);第三方支付,從來在台灣就不是一個「有待解決」的問題。沒有問題待解決,你想在這裡開辦事業,當然可以,但是,就得為消費者帶來新價值,否則誰理你。不論智冠歐買尬或橘子,想跳進來玩如果又必須創造新價值,唯一能想像的作法,就是像早期各家銀行為了衝信用卡的發卡量,所提供給消費者的各種優惠。 但是別忘了,當年銀行就信用卡給出優惠衝量,還有兩層的思惟:(1) 循環信用上看20%的利息收入、(2) 信用卡收單還有平均2%以上的清算清分手續費可收。 第三方支付呢? (1) 預付儲值,哪來的利息收入。(2) 悠遊卡能收取之清算清分手續費在超商這些零售點已經低到0.5%以下。 (更別提,悠遊卡還身兼交通票證,遊戲業有什麼?! 你要靠哪邊生出來的錢給消費者優惠?!)…

iPhone, Sigh-Phone?

Google-owner Alphabet passes Apple to become world’s most valuable company. 前些時日,才和朋友聊到蘋果在戰略思惟上之強項與弱項。在經營績效上,蘋果是個厲害的角色(Wal-Mart也是);但我從來都對蘋果沒有好感(我對Wal-Mart也是)。 谷歌字母公司全球市值最高企業 Google母公司字母(Alphabet)上季營收和獲利都超越預期,反映線上廣告銷售強勁,成本控管有成。 這是Google改採新架構、將主要搜尋和廣告業務部門(仍稱Google)從風險投資事業分開後,以母公司Alphabet為名公布的首份財報。去年第4季扣除支付給合作夥伴的營收成長19%至173億美元。淨利增加5%至49.2億美元,扣除一次性項目的每股盈餘為8.67美元。 就Google事業(含搜尋、Youtube、Android等)來說,第4季營收增長18%,全公司最大營收來源廣告收入成長近17%,至190.8億美元,點擊付費廣告數量成長31%。Google占集團營收99.3%。 這篇報導說,蘋果單季淨利就有184億美元,Alphabet要用四個季度才賺得到這麼多。但Alphabet市值現在就超越了蘋果,何以致之? MarketWatch的分析: (1) 成長腳步:蘋果上季營收僅增加1.7%(分析師還預期本季將會萎縮),Alphabet營收成長則有19%。 (2) 成長潛力:不僅iPhone,iPad和Mac銷售均萎縮,正在開發的產品也不成熟。反觀Alphabet對未來科技之投資,像是自駕車、Nest智慧家庭、光纖網路領域等,可望比起蘋果自駕車更早收穫投資回報 (3) 投資決策與績效:投資人看好Alphabet的大手筆投資,因為過去績效良好,YouTube就是個帶來大量行動廣告營收的例子。