Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

Apple Music Comes at Full Speed

2015 - 06 - 07

Apple looks beyond iTunes with launch of its streaming service

「When Apple unveils a new music streaming service at the Worldwide Developers Conference, it will largely leave behind its 15-year-old iTunes brand.

The company’s competitor to streaming pioneers such as Spotify and Pandora, the radio service, will simply be called Apple Music.

Co-founder Steve Jobs described iTunes as the earliest manifestation of the “intersection of technology and the liberal arts”. But from now on, it will remain only as the name of the old download store…….」

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f1d6e2ce-0b6b-11e5-994d-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz421BeGmm9
以下5點,為筆者的觀察

  1. 每一支iOS裝置都會被強制裝載(出廠預載或軟體更新)。
  2. 在手機上付費流程,只要點幾下就完成,整個完封大勝Spotify與KKBOX。

(沒有任何一家音樂串流業者之毛利率高到讓自己在付掉了30%的蘋果或谷歌稅之後還能活下去,大家的金流都只能在夾縫中求生存。)

  1. 不必與電信公司分帳。

(信用卡的手續費才不到2%,但其他音樂串流業者有極大百分比的月費必須透過電信帳單代收,其手續費高達15%)

  1. Apple當年靠iPod與iTunes重新站起來。因此,音樂在精神理念上對其非常重要,但所帶來的營收盈餘根本不重要(市值都已上看一兆美元了),所以縱然完全不賺錢都能做下去(比方說,如果有一天,Apple把錄音/詞曲/公開傳輸等著作權人的總拆分比拉高到85%… 如此一來,它既能賺到版權人的掌聲與跪謝、Taylor Swift又肯定願意讓它上架、再搏得了蘋果挺音樂的好名、又順便打敗了其他的音樂串流業者。)
  2. Apple硬體上的毛利概抓50%、AppStore躺著也能靠其他app業者賺進30%,這種辛苦向他人每年換約拿授權的內容產業怎麼賺也賺不了這麼多,拆分比根本就是業界半公開的秘密。所以,Apple只要靠更強的內容來賣硬體就好,IT業裡有誰能這麼做? 而且,玩了音樂串流之後接下來呢? Netflix的Reed Hastings不知道有無思量出對策?

如果Apple真有為這樣的決策,的確有可能會打敗其他串流業者;但是,當年M$用OS捆綁IE打敗Navigator的教訓記憶猶新,Spotify和KKBOX是不是會利用各國反競爭法來提前阻擋,頗值得觀察。

Recommended article 

The Difficult Situations of Netflix, Spotify and Pandora

The online music and video streaming services are facing the same uphill battle. 目前線上的影音串流業者,都面臨類似的困境。Netflix只有美國的實體DVD郵寄業務賺錢,串流部分則是做得愈多,虧得愈大。Spotify更不必講了,在全球喊得很大聲,然而它不但年年在賠,還賠很多。 只有Pandora,在串流音樂的領域是非常成功的。它砍掉搜尋這種on-demand功能,而主張自己是radio station之模式,支付遠較Spotify這種業者低的權利金。惟其在北美以外一直沒有明確的海外擴張計畫,因此台灣對它比較不熟悉。 它的UI/UX看得出是千錘百鍊的最佳化配置、進入市場早(2000年)、每年包括MAU(目前有八千萬人)及聆聽總時數等等各重要數據都正成長(以營收而言,2012年4億、13年6億、14年9.2億、15年近12億);而在營收配置上,廣告占80%、premium訂戶占20%,更是值得參考的模式。 在影音串流領域表現佳,但目前在NYSE上,Pandora市值不到美金20億,去年營收近12億,四年來都一樣,小虧。併掉了Rdio之後也不會有改善。 讀者可以參考華爾街日報的這篇文章: Pandora Media Swings to Loss Amid Higher Expenses Web-radio-service Pandora Media Inc. on Thursday swung to a loss in its…

Amazon's Dominance in Video Streaming

Amazon to Buy Video Reformatter Elemental Technologies Amazon.com Inc. is putting itself at the center of the Web video boom. The Seattle retailer agreed to acquire Elemental Technologies Inc., which helps media companies convert video to be played…

Merger Is Not the Cure for Everything

With Taiwan’s technology firms’ performance worsen, business pundits often advocates for mergers between local manufacturers or suppliers. 宏達電斷尾求生 能否東山再起? 「……光是靠台灣市場是沒有辦法讓宏達電起死回生的。唯一的辦法,也是拯救台灣品牌的方式,就是讓目前台灣幾家主要的智慧型手機廠商進行整併,大家一起重新整合資源,才有機會讓台灣品牌衝出一條路。」 http://udn.com/news/story/6848/1135575 每次遇到台廠出大問題,就會有企管蒙古大夫跳出來,開出「與競爭對手或上下游產業鏈整併」的處方箋。我看說他們蒙古夫夫並不貼切;藥到命除,用劊子手形容還合適些。 hTC + Asus + Acer + … 這種招式,小學生都講得出來。但是會不會有用? Continue reading