Skip to content

About us

eCounsel group

A boutique firm with unparalleled expertise in business and technology. We have good command of industrial ecology and legal practice, and have undertaken highly regarded cases. Because the small business scope, we pay more emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency, and choose clients with deliberation. The managing partner not only has extensive experiences in various legal issues more over than 20 years, but invests and manages several technology companies. In addition, he always checks each case rigorously. Clients’ business objectives are our primary focus. To achieve the same in the most cost-effective fashion trumps all seemingly sophisticated legal discussions.

PEWC Scandal

2011 - 12 - 12

PEWC has been founded for over half a century, it belonged to the first phase to build conventional industry, and then started to diversify and become more international.

走過半個世紀的「太平洋電線電纜公司」,從以前屬於創建傳統產業基礎的第一階段,到開啟多角化與國際化的第二階段。太電為台灣地區最大的電線電纜製造廠之一,不但在泰國、新加坡、澳洲、大陸地區有廠房,多角化的發展,更使太電成為一個跨足線纜、光電、通訊、衛星電視、電子資訊及高速鐵路等事業的企業集團。

1994年太電公司當時之副總經理及財務長胡洪九,利用公司資金在香港、英屬維京群島等地設立公司,以太電公司為擔保透過海外公司發行公司債,外加使用轉投資、不當交易等方式將資金轉入這些海外公司,再將這些資金匯到146家海外公司洗錢。

胡洪九還利用海外交叉持股,用太電公司在香港的資金購買不動產,將其登記再另一家海外公司名下,其擅自處分太電公司資產並不當挪用,利用假定存單掩飾資金缺口,事後企圖解散海外公司以防減掉追查,前前後後共掏空太電公司約171億元,使公司陷入財務危機,被媒體形容為世紀經濟犯罪掏空案。

太電公司於民國54年即已上市,長久以來被視為成長性佳的績優股,股東人數眾多,受到掏空案影響,導致太電下市,投資人受害人數創下新紀錄,國安基金也慘賠17億,等於是全民埋單!

Recommended article 

SEC Cracking Down ICOs

In the past few months, the U.S. SEC has significantly expanded its crackdown on hundreds of ICO projects, putting these startups at risk. Recently, the SEC has subpoenaed several ICO startups that failed to sell tokens…

Thailand Embraces Blockchain Economy

While the two biggest economies in the world are still trying to figure out how to think about blockchain and crypto, a Southeast Asian country known for its booming tourism industry is gradually becoming an active…

Thoughts on Third-Party Payment: It's a Fad

We have been through this topic in 2013. Third-party payment hasn’t been an “issue” in Taiwan. There is no problem to solve. 遊戲業攻支付 Q4激戰 「……目前樂點行動支付除將介接橘子集團旗下事業體,在全家、玉山、台灣大車隊、微程式等策略合作布局下,也將大幅拓展樂點行動支付應用場景,未來服務版圖將涵蓋遊戲、電商、P2P、娛樂、餐飲、交通、消費等線上至線下領域… 劉柏園表示,現階段將由自動找零的小額支付據點開始切入民生應用,讓消費者在販賣機、自助洗衣機、置物櫃、停車場等據點,能夠享受便利的行動支付服務,未來第三方支付也將成為集團營收主力……。」http://udn.com/news/story/7254/1218056 我早在2013年就講過了(http://goo.gl/DqJmEH);第三方支付,從來在台灣就不是一個「有待解決」的問題。沒有問題待解決,你想在這裡開辦事業,當然可以,但是,就得為消費者帶來新價值,否則誰理你。不論智冠歐買尬或橘子,想跳進來玩如果又必須創造新價值,唯一能想像的作法,就是像早期各家銀行為了衝信用卡的發卡量,所提供給消費者的各種優惠。 但是別忘了,當年銀行就信用卡給出優惠衝量,還有兩層的思惟:(1) 循環信用上看20%的利息收入、(2) 信用卡收單還有平均2%以上的清算清分手續費可收。 第三方支付呢? (1) 預付儲值,哪來的利息收入。(2) 悠遊卡能收取之清算清分手續費在超商這些零售點已經低到0.5%以下。 (更別提,悠遊卡還身兼交通票證,遊戲業有什麼?! 你要靠哪邊生出來的錢給消費者優惠?!)…